期刊文献+

美国法上的“危险病人”例外规则——以精神病医生的拒证特权为中心

The Exception Principle of "Dangerous Patients" in American Law——Centering on the Psychiatrist' Privilege of Refusing to Testify
下载PDF
导出
摘要 精神病医生一般掌握了患者的许多隐私,这些信息必须得到尊重,因为医患间的信任是病人成功治愈的重要前提。但是对于某些具有危险性的病人,如果其企图侵害第三者,医生有没有向有关机关报案的义务,在刑事案件中精神病医生是否应免于作证,这种作证豁免有无例外,如何在病人隐私和公众安全两者之间进行取舍,这就是美国法中"危险病人"例外规则所涉及的内容,这一规则对我国拒证制度的建立和发展具有积极的借鉴意义。 Psychiatrists often harbor much privacy of mental patients,which should be respected,for the trust between psychiatrists and patients is a prerequisite for successful therapy.But if some dangerous mental patients attempt to attack a third party,do psychiatrists have the duty to inform? Do psychiatrists have the duty to testify in criminal proceedings? How to balance between keeping patients' privacy and maintaining public safty? The exception principle of dangerous patient in American law just focuses on these above questions.This principle sheds light on the establishment and development of the privilege of being exempt from testifying in our country.
作者 张永 王学争
出处 《安徽广播电视大学学报》 2010年第4期17-20,共4页 Journal of Anhui Radio & TV University
关键词 危险病人 保密义务 披露义务 dangerous patient the duty to keep secret the duty to inform
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1刘荣军.论证人的证言拒绝权[J].法学,1999(5):25-31. 被引量:54
  • 2Michael H. Graham: Evidence National Institute for Trial Advocacy. Inc, Minnesota, 1983, p. 820.
  • 3Leon Letwin:Evidence Law:Commentavy,Problems and Cases,Matthew Bender. Co,New York, 1986,p.488.
  • 4Plulf. Rothstin. Evidence: Cases, Materials and Problems, MarthewBender, Co. New York, 1986. p. 489.
  • 5Eric. D. Green, Charles. R. Nesson: Problems Cases and Matterials on Evidence, Littlc, Brown and company. Boston. 1983 ,P. 520.
  • 6Allen Kuths: An Analytical Approach to Evidence, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1989, p. 772.
  • 7《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第45条.
  • 8《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第34条.
  • 9《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第65条.
  • 10卞建林译.《美国联邦刑事诉讼规则和证据规则》.中国政法大学出版社,1999年版.第133、110页.

共引文献146

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部