摘要
惠栋本着尊汉求古、实事求是的治经宗旨,以校字通经为基本方法,以尚礼为治经取向。惠栋的治经取向与研究方法,在方向上确定了清代《春秋》学尊汉征实之风气;在方法上确定了校字通经之法则;在训诂体式上促进了新疏的产生。惠栋的《春秋》学研究亦存在不少缺失,然而,瑕不掩瑜,其在清代《春秋》学史上的地位不容忽视。
Based on the goal of respecting Han and search for antiquity,and seeking truth from facts,Hui Dong's research on classics took textual emendation as its basic methodology,and up holding the value of "li" as its orientation.For the orientation of classic research,he established the general atmosphere of respecting Han scholarship and emphasizing truth and facts in the study of Spring and Autumn Annals in the Qing Dynasty.In terms of methodology,he established the standard of understanding the classics by textual criticism,and promoted the emerging of new style commentary of classics.Despite that there are also some defects in Hui's research,his position in the history of Qing Dynasty's research on Spring and Autumn Annals can not be neglected.
出处
《南京师范大学文学院学报》
CSSCI
2010年第4期156-161,共6页
Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
基金
江苏省博士后重点资助项目:惠栋训诂研究。编号:0902098C
关键词
惠栋
《春秋》学
训诂
Hui Dong
research on Spring and Autumn Annals
textual criticism