期刊文献+

颈前路分段减压植骨融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病 被引量:3

TREATMENT OF MULTI-LEVEL CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY BY ANTERIOR SEGMENTAL DECOMPRESSION AND AUTOGRAFT FUSION
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨颈前路分段减压植骨融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的方法和疗效。方法 2007年1月-2009年5月,采用颈前路分段减压植骨融合术治疗23例多节段脊髓型颈椎病。男16例,女7例;年龄49~70岁,平均58岁。均为连续3个节段病变,其中C3、4、C4、5、C5、615例,C4、5、C5、6、C6、78例。23例均有不同程度四肢与躯干感觉减退,双手握力减弱,双下肢行走不稳及腱反射亢进。颈椎MRI示均有3个节段椎间盘退变、突出,相应节段脊髓受压。病程6~28个月,平均12.5个月。将日本骨科协会(JOA)评分系统作为疗效评价标准,记录患者术前及术后1周,3、12个月JOA评分并计算改善率。结果 1例术中硬膜囊撕裂,以明胶海绵填塞,术后未见脑脊液漏。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。无椎动脉损伤及喉返神经损伤发生。23例均获随访,随访时间12~24个月,平均15.1个月。术后2周内患者神经症状明显好转,下肢肌力增加,肢体活动较术前明显改善,且双上肢感觉异常基本消失。1例术后1周钛网向上终板塌陷约2mm,随访期内未见加重;余内固定物位置良好。23例术后12个月颈椎正侧位X线片均可见椎间隙融合,椎间高度及生理弧度维持良好。JOA评分由术前(9.1±0.3)分提高至术后12个月(14.3±0.4)分,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);术后12个月时改善率为65.8%±0.2%。按照Odom临床效果分级标准评价:获优10例,良8例,可4例,差1例。结论颈前路分段减压植骨融合术可达到充分减压,即刻重建颈椎稳定性,植骨融合率高,是治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的有效方法之一。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of anterior segmental decompression and autograft fusion in treating multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods Between January 2007 and May 2009, 23 patients with multi-level CSM were treated with anterior segmental decompression, autograft fusion, and internal fixation. There were 16 males and 7 females with an average age of 58 years (range, 49-70 years). Consecutive 3 segments of C3,4, C4, 5, and C5, 6 involved in 15 cases and C4, 5, C5, 6, and C6, 7 in 8 cases. All patients suffered sensory dysfunction in limbs and trunk, hyperactivity of tendon reflexes of both lower extremities, walking with limp, and weakening of hand grip. Cervical MRI showed degeneration and protrusion of intervertebral disc and compression of cervical cord. The disease duration was 6 to 28 months (12.5 months on average). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score system was adopted for therapeutic efficacy evaluation. JOA scores were recorded preoperatively, 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Results Dura tear occurred in 1 case and was treated by filling with gelatinsponge during operation; no cerebrospinal fluid leakage was observed after operation. All the incisions healed by first intention. All cases were followed up 12 to 24 months (15.1 months on average), and no vertebral artery injury or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury occurred. The nervous symptoms in all cases were improved significantly within 1 week after operation. Lower limb muscle strength increased, upper limb abnormal sensation disappeared, and limb moved more agile. A 2-mm collapses of titanium mesh into upper terminal plate were found in 1 case and did not aggravated during follow-up. The other internal fixator was in appropriate situation, and the fusion rate was 100%. The JOA score increased from 9.1 ± 0.3 preoperatively to 14.3 ± 0.4 at 12 months postoperatively with an improvement rate of 65.8% ± 0.2%, showing significant difference (P 0.01). According to Odom evaluation scale, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 8 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case. Conclusion Anterior segmental decompression and autograft fusion is a recommendable technique for multi-level CSM, which can make full decompression, conserve the stability of cervical cord, and has high fusion rate.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期1476-1479,共4页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 脊髓型颈椎病 多节段 分段减压 Cervical spondylotic myelopathy Multi-level Segmental decompression
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献85

共引文献186

同被引文献35

  • 1Korinth MC. Treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease: current status and trends. Zentralbl Neurochir, 2008, 69(3): 113-124.
  • 2Matz PG, Ryken TC, Groff MW, et al. Techniques for anterior cervical decompression for radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine, 2009, 11 (2): 183- 197.
  • 3Vanek P, Bradac O, DeLacy P, et al. Comparison of 3 fusion techniques in the treatment of the degenerative cervical spine disease. Is stand- alone autograft really the "gold standard?": prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012, 37(19): 1645-1651.
  • 4Song KJ, Taghavi CE, Lee KB, et al. The efficacy of plate construct aug- mentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(26): 2886-2892.
  • 5Song KJ, Taghavi CE, Hsu MS, et al. Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spi- nal disorders. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(10): 1677-1683.
  • 6Chin KR, Eiszner JR, Adams SB. Role of plate thickness as a cause of dysphagia after anterior cervical. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(23): 2585-2590.
  • 7Rihn ]A, Kane ], Albert TJ, et al. What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin O rthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(3): 658-665.
  • 8Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD. Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2005, 87(3): 558-563.
  • 9Kim HJ, Kelly MP, Ely CG, et al. The risk of adjacent-level ossification development after surgery in the cervical spine: are there factors that affect the risk? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012, 37(22 Suppl): $65-74.
  • 10Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1991, 14(7): 409-415.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部