期刊文献+

标准及波前像差引导LASIK手术前后明暗环境下对比敏感度变化 被引量:3

Changes of contrast sensitivity under photopic or mesopic circumstance between before and after standardized LASIK or wavefront-guided LASIK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较标准LASIK和波前像差引导LASIK手术前后在明、暗环境下对比敏感度变化。方法选取接受标准LASIK或波前像差引导LASIK的中高度近视患者各30例,行明环境下和暗环境下对比敏感度检查,观察2组对比敏感度的变化。结果明环境下对比敏感度,术前2组在各个空间频率下无差异(P>0.05),术后波前组各个空间频率下对比敏感度均显著高于标准组(P<0.05);在有眩光干扰情况时1.0deg、0.7deg空间频率下波前组术后对比敏感度增加幅度分别为0.2004±0.3771、0.1639±0.3151,显著大于标准组(0.0584±0.2951、0.0560±0.2348)(P<0.05)。暗环境下对比敏感度,术后波前组各等级通过率均大于标准组,但仅在有眩光时差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月,明环境对比敏感度有眩光情况下,波前组均显著超过术前水平(P<0.05);标准组在6.3deg(1.7518±0.2072)、4.0deg(1.7235±0.1901)、2.5deg(1.5680±0.3009)、1.6deg空间频下显著超过术前水平,在1.0deg、0.7deg空间频率下高于术前水平,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6个月,明环境对比敏感度在无眩光情况下,2组对比敏感度均未恢复至术前水平,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论波前像差引导的LASIK手术视觉质量优于标准LASIK。 Objective To investigate changes of contrast sensitivity under photopic or mesopic circumstance between before and after standardized LASIK or wavefront-guided LASIK.Methods There were 30 medium or high myopic cases performed standardized LASIK,the other 30 medium or high myopic cases performed with wavefront-guided LASIK.Contrast sensitivity was detected under photopic and mesopic circumstances.Changes of contrast sensitivity were compared.Results Under photopic circumstance,contrast sensitivity had no difference in each spatial frequency between the two groups before operation(all P0.05).Contrast sensitivities in wavefront-guided LASIK group were higher than those in standardized LASIK group at different spatial frequencies after operation(all P0.05).With glare interference,contrast sensitivity of wavefront-guided LASIK increased more obvious(0.200 4±0.377 1 and 0.163 9±0.315 1)than standardized LASIK group(0.058 4±0.295 1 and 0.056 0±0.234 8)at spatial frequencies of 1.0 deg and 0.7 deg(both P0.05).Under mesopic circumstance,contrast sensitivities in wavefront-guided LASIK group were higher than those in standardized LASIK group at different spatial frequencies after operation,but only have differences with glare interference(all P0.05).At postoperative 6 months,contrast sensitivity of wavefront-guided LASIK was higher than those at pre-operation under photopic circumstance with glare interference(P0.05).Contrast sensitivities were 1.751 8±0.207 2 at spatial frequency of 6.3 deg,1.723 5±0.190 1 at spatial frequency of 4.0 deg,1.568 0±0.300 9 at spatial frequency of 2.5 deg,which were obviously higher than those at pre-operation,and also at spatial frequency of 1.6 deg.Contrast sensitivities at spatial frequencies of 1.0 deg and 0.7 deg were higher than those at pre-operation,but no difference was found(both P0.05).At postoperative 6 months,contrast sensitivities of both two groups were not recovered to the levels at pre-operation under photopic circumstance without glare.No difference was found(both P0.05).Conclusion Wavefront-guided LASIK is with better visual quality than standardized LASIK.
出处 《眼科新进展》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第12期1137-1140,1143,共5页 Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
基金 上海市科学技术委员会科技发展基金资助(编号:08411964600)~~
关键词 对比敏感度 LASIK 波前像差 明环境 暗环境 contrast sensitivity LASIK wavefront-guided LASIK photopic circumstance mesopic circumstance
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Freedman KA, Brown SM, Mathews SM, Young RS. Pupil size and the ablation zone in laser refractive surgery : Considerations based on geometric optics[ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg ,2003 ,29 (13) :1924-1931.
  • 2Chan JW, Edwards MH, Woo GC, Woo VC. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situkeratomileusis one-year follow-up[ J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2002,28 (12 ) : 1774-1779.
  • 3Rea M, Bullough J, Freyssinier-Nova J, Bierman A. A proposed unified system of photometry[ J ]. Lighting Res Technol, 2004, 36(2) ;85-111.
  • 4Hiraoka T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y, Takahira T, Kakita T, Oshika T. Mesopic contrast sensitivity and ocular higher-order aberrations after overnight orthokeratology [ J ]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008,145 ( 1 ) :645-655.
  • 5Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov R, Varssano D, Grinbaum A. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK[ J]. Ophthalmology,2004,111 (3) :454-457.
  • 6朱超,宋跃.视觉对比敏感度的临床应用[J].眼科新进展,2006,26(6):466-469. 被引量:38
  • 7Tetsuro O, Tadatoshi T, Tomokazu S. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratonfileusis [ J ]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2006,47(12) :1334-1338.
  • 8Mrochen M, Ksemmerer M, Seller T. Wavefront-gulded laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes [ J ]. J Refract Surg,2002,16(2) : 161-121.
  • 9Kim TW, Wee WR, Lee JH, Kim MK. Contrast Sensitivity After LASIK, LASEK, and wavefront-guided LASEK with the VISX S4 laser[ J]. J Refract Surg,2007,23 ( 4 ) :355-361.
  • 10Kim YI, Yang S J, Tohah H. Biateral comparison of wavefrontguided versus conventional laser in situ keratonfileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix [ J ]. J Refract Surg, 2004,20 ( 5 ) : 432- 438.

二级参考文献47

  • 1邱远东.视神经损害疾病的对比敏感度(CSF)检查[J].眼科新进展,1995,15(2):5-6. 被引量:1
  • 2丁传庆,孙葆忱.视网膜色素变性的对比敏感度改变及滤光镜对其影响[J].眼科研究,1996,14(3):189-192. 被引量:8
  • 3Lawless M A. Refining visual quality assessment in refractive surgery[J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 1999, 25 (8): 1031-2.
  • 4Seiler T, McDonnell P J. Excimer laser Photorefractive keratectomy[J] . Surv Ophthalmol, 1995, 40(2): 89-118.
  • 5Chan J W, Edwards M H, Woo G C, et al. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis [J]. J Cataract Refract Surg , 2002, 28(10): 1774-9.
  • 6Vesaluoma M, Perez-Santonja J, Petroll W M, et al. Corneal stromal changes induced by myoptic LASIK[J] . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci , 2000, 41(2): 369-76.
  • 7Applegate R A, Howland H C,Sharp R P, et al. Corneal aberration and visual performance after radial keratotomy[J].J Refract Surg, 1998, 14(4) :397-407.
  • 8Applegate R A, Howland H C. Refractive surgery, optical aberrations and visual performance[J] .J Refract Surg, 1997, 13(3):295-9.
  • 9Aktunc R, Aktunc T. Centration of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and changes in astigmatism [J]. J Refract Surg, 1996, 12(2):268-71.
  • 10Mark P, Howard F, Hoffman RS, Pies PA. Prospective randomized trial of an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens[J]. J Refract Surg 2002; 18:692-696.

共引文献55

同被引文献57

  • 1张丰菊,杨璐,于芳蕾,鲁智丽.近视及近视散光眼高阶像差的研究[J].眼视光学杂志,2006,8(2):112-114. 被引量:11
  • 2杜持新 沈晔 汪洋.个性化LASIK与传统LASIK术后高阶像差改变的对比分析.浙江大学学报:医学版,2007,8:177-180.
  • 3TMbo6 LN, Applesate RA, Sehwieg erlin8 JT,et al. Standard arne- porting heopt/ea-benatlons of eyes. J Refract Surg,2002,18:652- 660.
  • 4Thilx LN. Wavefront data reporting and terminology. J Refract Surg,2001,17 :578-583.
  • 5Oshika T, Klyee SD, Aplegate RA, et al. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after phototefraetive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999,127 : 1-7.
  • 6Chalita MB, Chavela S, Xu M, et al. Wavefmnt analysis, in post- LASIK eyes and its correclation with vimel symptoms,refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology ,2004,111:4-47-453.
  • 7Chalita MR,Kmeger tLR. Correclatiot of aberrations with visual a- cuity and symptoms. Ophthelmol Clin,2004,17 : 135-142.
  • 8Oshika TK, Miyata K,Tokunaga T,et el. Higher onier wavefront aberration of cornea and matude of refractive correction in laser situ keratomilcosis. Ophthel moo,,2002,9:1154 -1158.
  • 9Zhou C,Hai X,Yuan L,et al. Corneal higher-olier aberrations af- ter customized aspherie ahation and conventional alafioc :for my opic correction. Curt Eye Res,2007 ,32 :431-438.
  • 10王雁.波前像差和调制传递函数(MTF)在屈光手术视觉质量评价中的研究.2009.天津医科大学.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部