期刊文献+

计算机导航人工全膝关节置换与传统手术临床效果比较的Meta分析 被引量:8

Clinical outcomes after computer-assisted TKA as compared with traditional techniques. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]系统评价计算机导航辅助人工全膝关节置换(CASTKA)与传统TKA技术临床效果的差异。[方法]计算机检索MEDLINE、Cochrane、EMbase、CNKI数字图书馆等数据库,并手工检索查找有关比较CASTKA与传统术式的临床试验研究报道。由2名评价员独立筛查试验、提取资料和评估方法学质量,采用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan5.0软件进行Meta分析。[结果]共纳入符合本研究设计标准的临床随机对照试验16篇,计算机导航组1003膝,传统方法组917膝。导航组下肢力线内翻或外翻3°以内的发生率高于传统组;胫骨和股骨假体冠状位对线内翻或外翻角在3°以内的发生率,导航组亦优于传统组。导航组在胫骨假体后倾角、股骨假体外旋角和深静脉血栓发生率与传统组比较差异无统计学意义。[结论]与传统技术相比计算机辅助系统能带来更佳的下肢力线和假体位置,但长期的临床疗效和CAS系统的临床效价比尚需更多研究。 [Objective]To compare the clinical outcomes between the CAS(computer-assisted surgery) and conventional total knee arthroplasty(TKA).[Methods]Randomized controlled trials about the comparison of conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasties were searched in MEDLINE,Cochrane Library,EMbase,and CNKI.Some published and unpublished references were also hand-searched.Study selection and assessment,data collection and analyses were undertaken by two reviewers independently.The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 was used for data analyses.[Results]After a comprehensive search,16 original randomized controlled trials(involving 1920 knees) were included in this analysis.The computer-navigation group consisted of 1 003 knees,and the conventional group consisted of 917 knees.All trails were identified as meeting all the eligibility criteria.The mechanical axis alignment of the lower limb was significantly better in the computer-assisted group compared with the conventional group.The coronal alignment of the tibial and femoral component alignment was also more accurate in the computer-assisted group.The meta-analysis did not find a significant difference in the posterior slope of the tibial component,axial(rotational) alignment of the femoral component and deep-venous thrombosis.[Conclusion]Computer-assisted TKA gives a better correction of alignment of the leg and orientation of the components compared with the conventional technique.Long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using computer-assisted systems in TKAs require further investigation.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第23期1937-1940,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 人工关节置换 计算机辅助 导航 外科手术 META分析 arthroplasty knee computer-assisted navigation surgery Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Davis CR, Davies AP, Newman JH. Causes of failure of the kinemax plus total knee replacement in the first five years [ J ]. Knee , 2007, 14:158 - 161.
  • 2Nizard R. Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthmplasty [J]. Acta Orthop Belg ,2002,68:215 -230.
  • 3Ryan GM, Kevin CA, Knute CB, et al. Computer - assisted navigation software advancements improve the accuracy of total knee arthroplasty [ J]. J Arthroplasty,2010,4:501 -512.
  • 4Jenny JY, Boeri C. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses : a comparative study with conventional instrumentation[ J ]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb ,2001,139 : 117 - 119.
  • 5Stulberg DS, Picard F, Saragaglia D. Computerassisted total knee replacement arthroplasty[ J]. Oper Tech Ortho, 2000,10:25.
  • 6Saragaglia D, Pieard F, Chaussard C,et al. Computer - assisted knee arthroplasty : comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective, randomized study [ J ]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 2001,87 : 18.
  • 7Sparmann M, Wolke B, Gzupalla H, et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2003 ,85 :830 - 835.
  • 8Oberst M, Bertsch C,Wurstlin S,et al. CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective, and randomized study [ J ]. Unfallchirurg ,2003,106:941.
  • 9Bernd S, Michael N, Rafal R,et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty[ J]. Clin Orthop,2004, 426 : 180 - 186.
  • 10Jan V, Davy H. Image - based computer - assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment [ J ]. Clin Orthop,2004,428:131 - 139.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S,et al. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term follow up[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2001,388:18 -25.
  • 2Laskin RS , Beksac B, Phongjunakom A, et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision : an outcome study[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res ,2004 ,428 :74 -81.
  • 3Bullens PH, Loon CJ, Waal Malefijt MC ,et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments [ J ] . J Arthroplasty, 2001,16 : 740 - 747.
  • 4Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005,440:77 - 81.
  • 5Boerger TO, Aglietti P. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005, 440:82 - 87.
  • 6Bonutti PM, Neal DJ, Kester MA. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique[J]. Orthopedics,2003,26: 899 - 903.
  • 7Kotani A, Yonekura A, Bourne R. Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. J Arthroplasty, 2005,20:850 - 856.
  • 8Lombardi AV, Viacava AJ. Rapid recovery protocols and minimally invasive surgery help achieve high knee flexion [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res ,2006,452 : 117 - 122.
  • 9Haas SB, Manitta MA, Burdick P. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty : the mini midvastus approach[ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006,452:112 - 116.
  • 10张先龙,K HSeow.人工全膝置换在严重膝内翻畸形患者中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2001,8(12):1153-1156. 被引量:11

共引文献7

同被引文献99

  • 1冷重光,赵江涛,陈崇民,李忠强,张红娜,赵阳.计算机导航辅助下人工全膝关节置换术[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(10):666-670. 被引量:19
  • 2裴福兴,李程.计算机导航全膝关节置换系统[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(10):699-702. 被引量:7
  • 3Watanabe T, Muneta T, Ishizuki M. Is a minimally invasive approach superior to a conventional approach for total knee arthroplasty? Early outcome and 2 - to 4 - year follow - up [ J ]. J Orthop Sci, 2009,5 : 589 - 595.
  • 4Boerger TO, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N, et al. Mini - subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. Clin Or- thop, 2005,440:82 - 87.
  • 5Chin PL, Foo LS, Yang KY, et al. Randomized controlled trial com-. paring the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. J Arthroplasty,2007,6 : 800 - 806.
  • 6Kim YH, Kim JS, Kim DY. Clinical outcome and rate of complica- tions after primary total knee replacement performed with quadrieeps - sparing or standard arthrotomy [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007,4 : 467 - 470.
  • 7Kolisek FR, Bonutti PM, Hozack WJ,et al. Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty : ear- ly results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach [ J ]. J Arthroplasty,2007,1 : 8 - 13.
  • 8Tashiro Y, Miura H, Matsuda S, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach in total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. Clin Orthop,2007, 463:144 - 150.
  • 9Chotanaphuti T, Ongnamthip P, Karnchanalerk K,et al. Comparative study between 2 cm limited quadriceps exposure minimal invasive sur- gery and conventional total knee arthroplasty in quadriceps function: prospective randomized controlled trial [ J ]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2008, 2 :203 - 207.
  • 10Han I, Seong SC, Lee S,et al. Simultaneous bilateral MIS -TKA re- suits in faster functional recovery [ J ]. Clin Orthop, 2008,6 : 1449 - 1453.

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部