期刊文献+

汉语动/名词词类歧义消解初探 被引量:4

The Resolution of Chinese Verb/Noun Syntactic Category Ambiguity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用自控速度的移动窗口技术,在1个实验中考察由动/名词类歧义词引发的句法歧义的消解机制。阅读材料为含有双字词类歧义词的句子。结果表明:Gibson乘法模型和新再分析模型结合在一起比竞争模型和不受限竞赛模型能够更好地预测和解释由汉语动/名词类歧义词引发的句法歧义的消解。 In on experiment,three models,i.e. the competing model,the unrestricted raced model and a combination model of the unrestricted raced model and Gibson's multiplication model were tested. The task was self-paced word-by-word reading with a moving window display. The data showed if the pre-critical word was "的",in the keyword area,no significance difference was observed between the ambiguity condition and non-ambiguity condition. Moreover,after the keyword,the reading time of the ambiguity condition was also the same as that of the non-ambiguity condition.
作者 韩迎春 莫雷
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期1338-1343,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30870783) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大研究项目资助(05JJDXLX005) 广东省自然科学基金团队项目(06200524)的资助
关键词 句子理解 词类歧义消解 竞争模型 新再分析模型 Gibson乘法模型 Sentence comprehension Syntactic category disambiguation competition model unrestricted raced model Gibson's multiplication model
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1孙兵,刘鸣.句法歧义句理解加工中的语义关联性效应研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):34-36. 被引量:7
  • 2武宁宁,舒华.汉语词类歧义解决初探[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):60-63. 被引量:11
  • 3Boland, J. E. (1997). Resolving syntactic category ambiguities in discourse context: Probabilistic and discourse constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 36: 588- 615.
  • 4Boland J. E., & Blodgett A. (2001). Understanding the constraints on syntactic generation: lexical bias and discourse congruency effects on eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 45 : 391 - 411.
  • 5Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. (2000). Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29-231 - 240.
  • 6Gibson E. (2006). The interaction of top down and bottom up statistics in the resolution of syntactic category ambiguity. Journal of memory and language, 54: 363 - 388.
  • 7Kuperberg G. R. ( 2007 ). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146:23- 49.
  • 8MacDonald, M. C. (1993). The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of memory and language, 32:692 - 715.
  • 9Pritchett B. L. (1998). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64: 539 - 576.
  • 10Rodd J., Gaskell G., & Marslen - Wilson W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of memory ad language, 46 : 245- 266.

二级参考文献17

  • 1李俏,张必隐.句子语境中语义联系效应和句法效应的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(2):289-291. 被引量:7
  • 2张亚旭,舒华,张厚粲,周晓林.话语参照语境条件下汉语歧义短语的加工[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):126-134. 被引量:29
  • 3[1]Tanenhaus M K,Leiman J M,Seidenberg M S. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18:427 - 440
  • 4[2]Seidenberg M S,Tanenhaus M K,Leiman J M,Bienkowski M. Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing.Cognitive Psychology, 1982,14:489 - 537
  • 5[3]Frazier L,Rayner K. Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities:Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language , 1987,26 (5): 505- 526
  • 6[4]Friederici A D,Hahne A,Mecklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effccts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. and Cognition, 1996,22 (5): 1219 - 1248
  • 7[5]MacDonald M C. The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 1993; 32 (5):692 - 715
  • 8[6]Boland J E. Resolving syntactic catcgory ambiguities in discourse context: Probabilistic and discourse constraints. Journal of Memory and Languagc, 1997,36(4) :588 - 615
  • 9[8]Clifton C J,Kennison S M,Albrecht J E. Reading thc words her, his, him: Implications for parsing principles based on frequency and on structure. Journal of Memory and Language,1997;36(2) :276 - 292
  • 10[9]MacDonald M C,Pearlmutter N J,Seidenberg M S. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 1994; 101:676 - 703

共引文献16

同被引文献109

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部