期刊文献+

元认知能力对初中生事后偏差的影响 被引量:4

The Effect of Junior High School Students' Meta-cognitive Ability on Hindsight Bias
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用问卷情景导入,通过真实事件材料考察了初中生的元认知能力对其产生事后偏差的影响,及此影响是否仅存于假设型范式中。结果发现:在两种范式下,元认知能力较高的初中生所表现出的事后偏差均显著低于元认知能力较低者。在不同范式下,起显著预测作用的元认知能力成分有所不同。在回忆型范式中,初中生的元认知技能和元认知体验能力越强,其事后偏差越小;而在假设型范式中,初中生的元认知知识和元认知技能越强,其事后偏差越小。 The effect of individual meta-cognitive ability on hindsight bias was investigated throngh the materials of real events among junior high school students. Also investigated was,whether this effect could be found in the hypothetical design only. The results showed that:compared with students with lower meta-cognitive abilities,students with higher meta-cognitive abilities showed less hindsight bias; In addition,components of meta-cognition played different roles in different designs. In the memory design,the significant predictive roles in dhindsight bias were meta-cognition skills and meta-cognition experience. The students who showed greater abilities in these two aspects generated less hindsight bias. In the hypothetical design,the significant predictive roles were meta-cognition knowledge and meta-cognition skills. Students with stronger abilities in these two had less bias.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期1368-1374,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 全国教育科学规划国家重点项目(ABA050001)资助
关键词 元认知能力 事后偏差 回忆型范式 假设型范式 初中生 meta-cognitive ability the hindsight bias memory design hypothesis design junior high school students
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1汪玲,郭德俊,方平.元认知要素的研究[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(1):44-49. 被引量:72
  • 2汪玲 郭德俊.元认知的本质与要素[J].心理学报,2000,32(4):458-463.
  • 3Arkes, H. R., Wortmann, R. C., Saville. P. D., & Harkness, A. R. ( 1981 ). Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 584 - 588.
  • 4Bryant, F. B., & Guilbault, R. L. (2002). "I knew it all along" eventually. The development of hindsight bias in reaction to the Clinton impeachment verdict. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 27 - 41.
  • 5Christensen Szalanski, J. J., & Willhm, C. F. (1991). The hindsight bias: A meta- analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 147 - 168.
  • 6Davies, M. F. (1998). Dogmatism and belief formation. Output interference in the processing of supporting and contradictory cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 456- 466.
  • 7Davies, M. F. (1992). Field dependence of hindsight bias: Cognitive restructuring and the generation of reasons. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 58 - 74.
  • 8Detmer, D. :E., Fryback, D.G., & Gassner, K. (1978). Heuristics and biases in medical decision making. Journal of Medical Education, 53, 682 - 683.
  • 9Erdfelder, E. , & Buchner, A. ( 1995 ). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 387- 414.
  • 10Erin M. Harley. (2007). Hindsight bias in legal decision making. Social Cognition, 25, 48- 83.

二级参考文献11

  • 1程素萍.问题解决中的元认知研究综述[J].教育理论与实践,1996,16(3):16-19. 被引量:38
  • 2杜晓新.元认知在认知活动中的作用——兼论如何培养学生的元认知能力[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1992,21(3):136-139. 被引量:20
  • 3董奇.论元认知[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1989(1):68-74. 被引量:516
  • 4汪玲 郭德俊.元认知的本质与要素[J].心理学报,2000,32(4):458-463.
  • 5杜晓新、冯震著:《元认知与学习策略》,人民教育出版社,1999.11.
  • 6Flavell, J.H. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In:L.B. Resnick (Ed.). The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976. 232.
  • 7Flavell, J.H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of psychology inquiry. In : T. O. Nelson ( Ed. ). Metacognition : Core Readings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1979. 3-8.
  • 8Brown, A,L. Knowing when, where, and how to remember:A problem of metacognition. In: R. Glaser ( Ed, ), Advances in Instructional Psychology (Vol.1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978. 137.
  • 9Schraw, G. & Dennies, R.S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Education Psychology. 1994,Vol. 19. 460-475.
  • 10O'Neil, H.F. & Abedi, J. Reliability and validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: potential for alternative assessment. Journal of Educational Research. 1996, Vol, 89(4). 234-245.

共引文献152

同被引文献117

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部