期刊文献+

框架效应:情感的启发式 被引量:4

The Framing Effect:a Heuristic Method of Affect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过测定13名大学生在完成框架效应问题时的事件相关电位(ERP),探讨了框架效应产生时的脑内时程动态变化。结果发现,无论是以反应时为因变量,还是以"确定"选项和"风险"选项的选择率为因变量,框架效应都存在。正面框架和负面框架诱发的ERP晚成分均表现出先有一个正走向的变化,在500ms左右达到峰顶后(P500),逐渐转变为负走向的变化趋势。在900~1200ms的时间窗口内,框架效应存在半球效应,在左半球有更大的激活。对差异波(负面框架减正面框架)的偶极子溯源分析结果显示,该成分主要起源于右脑的边缘叶(Li mbic Lobe)和扣带后回(posterior Cingulate:Brodmann area31),可能主要与情绪的评价有关,"正面框架"和"负面框架"表达了一种情感信息。结果进一步验证了决策的双加工理论。 The purpose of the present study was to investigate the spatiotemporal patterns of the brain in the gain frame and in the loss frame by means of high-density ERP recording and dipole source analysis. in 13 normal college students participed. The behavioral results showed that response time and the choice types were significantly affected by the framing effect. The ERPs result revealed both the gaining frame description and losing frame description elicited a positive ERP deflection from 300 ms to 600 ms and at the top of the peak in the time window 500ms(P500). In the time window of 900~1200ms,hemisphere superiority effect existed. The losing frame needs to pay more attention than the gaining frame. The left hemisphere has a greater activation,which indicated that the participants made an analytic processing style. Dipole source analysis for the difference wave (gaining frame minus losing frame) from 900ms to 1200ms indicated that a generator was localized in the posterior cingulate cortex (BA 31),possibly related to emotion rating function. Gaining frame and losing frame like as an affect heuristic. Our results verified the dual process theory of decision.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期1375-1380,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 西南大学科技基金资助项目(104060-20710911)的资助
关键词 框架效应 扣带后回 情感启发式 半球侧化 framing effect posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) an affect heuristic hemisphere lateralization
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Banich, M. T. ( 2004 ). Cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  • 2Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., et al. (2001). Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619 - 639.
  • 3Chen, M., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation, immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 25, 215- 224.
  • 4Colin, F. C. (2000). Prospect Theory in the Wild: Evidence from the Field. The Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press. New York, 288 - 300.
  • 5Delgado, M. R., Locke, H. M., Stenger, V. A., et al. (2003). Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations. Cognitive, affective behavioral neuroscience, 3, 27- 38.
  • 6De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., Dolan, R.J. (2006) ,. Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision- Making in the Human Brain. Science, 313, 684 - 687.
  • 7Evans, B.T., (2002). Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychol. Bull. 128, 978- 996.
  • 8Evans, B.T., (2003). In two minds: dual - process accounts of reasoning. Trends of cognitive Science, 7, 454 - 459.
  • 9Kahneman, D. , & Frederick, S. (2006). Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendencies. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 2.
  • 10Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341- 350.

同被引文献64

  • 1庄锦英.论情绪的生态理性[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):809-816. 被引量:20
  • 2高利苹,李纾,时勘.从对框架效应的分析看风险决策的神经基础[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(6):859-865. 被引量:14
  • 3孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:145
  • 4Averbeck, J. M., Jones, A., & Robertson, K. (2011). Prior knowledge and health messages: An examination of affect as heuristics and information as systematic processing for fear appeals. Southern Communication Journal, 76(1), 35-54.
  • 5Bateman, I., Dent, S., Peters, E., Slovic, P., & Starmer, C. (2007). The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 365-380.
  • 6Bhullar, N., Hine, D., Marks, A., Davies, C., Scott, J., & Phillips, W. (in press). The affect heuristic and public support for three types of wood smoke mitigation policies.
  • 7Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Desenrtes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
  • 8De Martino, B., Ktanaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684- 687.
  • 9Denseombe, M. (2010). The affect heuristic and perceptions of "the young smoker" as a risk object. Health, Risk and Society, 12(5), 425--440.
  • 10Dijker, A. J., & Koomen, W. (1996). Stereotyping and attitudinal effects under time prsure. Eurnpean Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 61-74.

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部