期刊文献+

印象管理图式的反应特点和加工机制 被引量:4

The Reaction Property and Processing Mechanism of Impression Management Schemes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以中学生为对象考察了印象管理自我图式、语义图式的反应特点和加工特征。研究一在预测的基础上运用自编制情境问卷探讨了两个图式下不同角色的印象管理反应特点,结果发现语义图式下印象管理水平高,尤以人际道德角色更高,自我图式下能力角色高掩饰。研究二通过现场情境实验检验了两种图式下高中生对印象管理词汇和诚实反应词汇的回忆辨别力和判断标准,发现词汇辨别力和判断标准出现了指数性分离,自我图式判断标准更严。结论:印象管理自我图式加工有更强的内隐性,语义图式下的印象管理行为具有刻板化和程式化倾向。 Two studies explored the reaction property and implicit processing mechanism of impression management self schema and semantic schema in the adolescents. The situation tests based on the prediction in Study 1 surveyed 633 students' opinion about the acting level of roles when they acted the interpersonal-moral role and the ability role under the semantic schema and the self schema. The results presented that the acting level of the semantic schema is higher,especially for the interpersonal-moral role. The ability role under the self schema had more acting. Study 2 set up a field situation experiment of a campaign scene. Students from Grade 11 of two schemes had the same d' and different β to acting response words and true response words. The β in the self schema was strict. These results showed that the processing of the self scheme was more implicit than the semantic schema and the acting impression management behavior in the semantic schema was stereotyped.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期1385-1388,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年项目(09YJCXLX016) 陕西师范大学人文社会科学研究基金(08SYB08)资助
关键词 印象管理 自我图式 语义图式 情境 impression management self schema semantic schema situation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1李琼 郭德俊.中国人印象整饰特征及其影响因素初探[J].心理科学,1999,:22-573,488.
  • 2杨治良,李朝旭.局中人和局外人的决策差异研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1282-1287. 被引量:20
  • 3周爱保 社会印象 意识.还是无意识控制[J].心理科学,2000,:23-445,440.
  • 4LAPervin著,周蓉等译.(2001/1995).人格科学.上海:华东师范大学出版社.
  • 5Goffman Erving. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
  • 6Holden RR, Fekken GC, & Cotton DHG. (1991). Assessing Psychopathology using structured test - item response latencies. Psychological Assessment, 3, 111 - 118.
  • 7Schlenker BR. ( 1975 ). Self - presentation: Managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self - enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1030- 1037.
  • 8Schlenker BR, Wowra SA. (2003). Carryover effects of feeling socially transparent or impenetrable on strategic self presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 871 - 880.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Svenson O. Risks of road transportation in a psychological perspective. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1978, 10:267-280
  • 2Weinstein N D. Seeking reassuring or threatening information about environmental cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1979, 16:220-224
  • 3Taylor S E. The social bcing in social psychology. In: D.Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.). Handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. (Vol. 1 ). New York: McGrawHill, 1998:58-98
  • 4Loewenstein G L, Weber E U, Hsee C K, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 2001, 127 (2): 267-286
  • 5Shapira Z. Risk taking: A managerial perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1995
  • 6Dawes, R M. Behavioral decision making and judgment.In: D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.).Handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. (Vol. 1 ). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998:497-548
  • 7Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47: 263-291
  • 8Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choices. Science, 1981, 211: 453-458
  • 9Jone E E, Nisbett R E. The actor and the observer:Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In: E. E.Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S.Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.). Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ
  • 10Hsee C K, Weber E U. A fundamental prediction error: Self-others discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1997, 126 (1): 45-53

共引文献19

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部