期刊文献+

CAT初始阶段被试能力估计方法改进探究 被引量:2

The Improvement of Estimators in the Initial Ability Estimation of CAT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在CAT初始阶段被试作答的信息较少,对被试能力进行合理和稳健的估计比较困难。本文设计CAT测试过程的代表性测验样例,使用不同能力估计方法比较CAT初始阶段的被试能力估计情况。在单参数模型下,在题量较少时,EAPE-N(0,0.5)方法的能力估计的合理性和稳健性要相对优于MLE、EAPE-N(0,2)、EAPE-N(0,1)方法。在CAT测试过程中可以先使用先验分布方差较小的EAPE方法进行估计,随着测试题量增加,逐步增大EAPE方法的先验分布方差,并可以和a分层选题策略结合起来使用。 From initial ability estimation to interim ability estimation in the process of a computerized adaptive test,there are a few responses to the items. The authors design a classic sample test which represents a part of CAT in the initial ability estimation. Under one-parameter logistic model,the ability estimation of the method of EAPE-N(0,0.5) is more accurate and robust than the method of MLE,EAPE-N(0,1),EAPE-N(0,2). The authors propose new methods that in the process of ininitial ability estimation and interim ability estimation:firstly we can use the method of EAPE with smaller prior variance,for example,EAPE-N(0,0.5). As the examinees make responses to more items,we can use the method of EAPE with bigger prior variance,for example,EAPE-N(0,1.5),or EAPE-N(0,2). And a-Stratified multistage can be applied in the initial estimation while the method of the adjusted EAPE is uosed.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期1470-1472,共3页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(2009JJDXLX006) 广东省自然科学基金项目(9151063101000002)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1张华华.计算机自适应考试设计中的误区[J].考试研究,2002,(2):35-39.
  • 2张华华,程莹.计算机化自适应测验(CAT)的发展和前景展望[J].考试研究,2005,1(1):12-24. 被引量:15
  • 3Chang, H. H. , & Ying, Z. (2002). To weight or not to weight - Balancing influence of initial and later items in adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
  • 4Chang, H. H. & Ying, Z. L. (2008): To weight or not to Weight? Balancing influence of initial items in adaptive testing. Psychornetrik, 73(3), 441- 450.
  • 5Embretson, S. E. , & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 6Kaplan Publishing. (2004). GRE exam, (p. 79). New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • 7Lurie, K., Pecsenye, M., Robinson, A., & Ragsdale, D. (2005). Cracking the GRE. New York: Princeton Review.
  • 8Rulisqn K. , & Loken, E. (2009). I' ve fallen and I can' t get up: can highability students recover from early mistakes in CAT? Applied Psychological Measurement ,33(2), 83 - 101.
  • 9Van der Linden, W. J. , & Pashley P. J. (2000). Item selection and ability estimation in adaptive testing. In W. J. Van der Linden, & C. A. W. Glas. Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 1 - 52). 2000, DORDRE CH · BOSTON · LONDON: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

共引文献23

同被引文献54

  • 1殷华,宋继华.CAT能力求解算法研究与优化[J].中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版),2005,11(2):59-61. 被引量:1
  • 2王祖俭,黄国兵,丁树良.基于遗传算法的项目反应理论3PLM参数估计[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(6):475-477. 被引量:4
  • 3陈平,丁树良,林海菁,周婕.等级反应模型下计算机化自适应测验选题策略[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):461-467. 被引量:38
  • 4戴海琦,陈德枝,丁树良,邓太萍.多级评分题计算机自适应测验选题策略比较[J].心理学报,2006,38(5):778-783. 被引量:30
  • 5Albert, J. H. Bayesian estimation of normal ogive item response curves using Gibbs sampling[J]. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992,17 (3) : 251-269.
  • 6Birnbaum, A. Some latent ability models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability[M]. In F.M. Lord & M.R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 1968 : 392-479.
  • 7Bock, R., & Aitkin, M. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm[J]. Psychometri- ka, 198 l, 46(4) :443-459.
  • 8Boek, R., & Mislevy, R. J. Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment[J]. Applied Psychological Measure- ment, 1982,6(4):431-444.
  • 9Chen, S., Hou, L., & Dodd, B. G. A comparison of maximum likeli- hood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model[J]. Educational And Psychological Mea- surement, 1998,58(4) : 569-595.
  • 10Eignor, D. R. & Schaeffer, G. A. Comparability studies for the GRE General CAT and the NCLEX using CAT[M]. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, April 1995.

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部