期刊文献+

用系统进化树重建方法确定HCV基因分型的最佳区域 被引量:2

By Phylogenetic Tree Ascertain the Best Method of Genotyping Region Reconstruction of HCV
原文传递
导出
摘要 从系统进化树重建原理出发,比较了HCV常用的几个基因分型区域的分型效果,包括5′UTR、core、E1、E2和NS5B区,探讨最能代替全基因组基因分型的区域.结果发现以5′UTR区建树,基因分型不完全正确而以core区、E1区、E2区及NS5B区建树,基因分型均完全正确,但同一基因型间的核苷酸演化距离存在差异.计算5条1a型序列的core区、E1区、E2区、NS5B区的核苷酸演化距离并和全基因组序列核苷酸演化距离比较,结果发现NS5B蛋白区基因分型最能反映病毒株的演化关系.确定NS5B区为丙型肝炎病毒基因分型的最佳区域. Prom the phylogenetic tree reconstruction principle,we compared the HCV genotyping of several commonly used in the sub-region type effects,including the 5'UTR,core, E1,E2,and NS5B areas,to explore the best instead of whole-genome genotyping of regional.The results are found to have 5'UTR District achievements,genotyping is not entirely correct to core areas,E1 area,E2 area and NS5B District achievements,genotyping are completely correct,but the same genotype evolution of the distance between the nucleotide differences in.Calculation 5 1a-type sequence of core areas,E1 area,E2 area,NS5B region and the nucleotide distance and evolution of whole-genome nucleotide sequence of evolutionary distance comparison and found that NS5B protein gene typing of best reflects the strain of the virus evolutionary relationships. Determine the area of hepatitis C virus NS5B genotyping of the best area.
出处 《生物数学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期515-520,共6页 Journal of Biomathematics
关键词 系统进化树 HCV 基因分型 最佳区域 Phylogenetic tree HCV Genotyping Best Regional
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1谢尧,徐道振,陆志檬,骆抗先,贾继东,王宇明,赵桂珍,张树林,张大志.HCV基因型对慢性丙型肝炎干扰素疗效的影响[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2004,12(2):72-75. 被引量:50
  • 2李梅,白凤兰.基于DTW距离的DNA序列相似性分析[J].生物数学学报,2009,24(2):374-378. 被引量:11
  • 3陈建国.远缘杂交中不育基因的位置和效应的最大似然估计[J].生物数学学报,2000,15(2):240-244. 被引量:3
  • 4Doytchinova IA, Flower DR. Physicoehemical explanation of peptide binding to HLA-A*0201 major histo- compatibility complex: a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study[J]. Proteins, 2002, 48(3):505-518.
  • 5Fukami KK, Tateno Y. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions[J]. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 1991, 32(1):79-91.
  • 6Hasegawa M, Fujiwara M. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny[J]. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 1993, 2(1):1-5.
  • 7Susko E, Inagaki Y, Roger AJ. On Inconsistency of the Neighbor-Joining, Least Squares, and Minimum Evolution Estimation When Substitution Processes Are Incorrectly Modeled[J]. Molecular Biology and Evo- lution, 2004, 21(9):1629-1642.
  • 8Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, et al. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2007, 24(8):1596-1599.
  • 9Simmonds P, Bukh J, Combet C, et al. Consensus proposals for a unified systemof nomenclature of hepatitis C virus genotypes[J]. Hepatology, 2005, 42(4):962-973.
  • 10Murphy DG, Willems B, Deschenes M, et al. Use of sequence analysis of the NS5B Region for Routine Genotyping of Hepatitis C Virus with Reference to C/E1 and 5' Untranslated Region Sequences[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2007, 45(4): 1102-1112.

二级参考文献18

共引文献69

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部