期刊文献+

突发环境事件损失价值评估方法及案例研究 被引量:2

Evaluation Methodology of Environmental Accidents Loss and a Case Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章首先从评估项目设置、损失计量方法的选择、评估实施步骤等方面探讨了突发环境事件损失价值评估方法,突出其系统性及实用性。突发环境事件的影响对象可分为肇事方和外部损失承受者,其中后者又可分为生产部门、社会群体、管理部门和生态环境;损失可分为财务损失和生态环境损失两类;损失计量方法可依据法律条文并参照已有的研究成果根据具体情况选定;评估步骤包括事件调查、损失分析及计量、结果分析、撰写评估报告四步。最后利用所建立的方法,对某化工企业突发环境污染事件的损失价值评估进行了案例研究。 The article firsty discusses the loss evaluation methodolgy of environmental accidents in three aspects: loss items setting, methods of measuring the losses, the steps of conducting evaluation. Impact object of an environmental accident can be divided into the responsible party and external loss bearers, the latter can be divided into the productive sectors, social groups, and management departments and ecosystems. Losses can be divided into two categries of financial loss and environmental damage. To select loss measurement method should be based on the law and make reference to the existing research results. Evaluating procedure includes four steps: incident investigation, loss analysis and measurement, result analysis, writing assessment report. Finally based on the methodology, a case study is conducted.
出处 《生态经济》 北大核心 2011年第1期24-28,40,共6页 Ecological Economy
基金 国家环境保护部环境应急与事故调查中心"重特大突发环境事件污染及生态破坏损失评估研究(环境保护部环境监察执法专项)"
关键词 突发环境事件 损失价值评估方法 案例研究 影响对象 损失种类 评估程序 environmental accident loss evaluation methodology case study impact object loss categories evaluating procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1陈冠雄,黄国宏,黄斌,吴杰,于克伟,徐慧,薛晓华,王正平.稻田CH_4和N_2O的排放及养萍和施肥的影响[J].应用生态学报,1995,6(4):378-382. 被引量:99
  • 2编写组.自然辩证法概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1997.203.
  • 3王利民 杨立新.侵权行为法[M].北京:法律出版社,1996.344.
  • 4转引:D.L.A.Barker Law[M].New Edition.1989.203.
  • 5马克思 恩格斯.路德维希.费尔巴哈和德国古典哲学的终结[A]..马克思恩格斯选集[C]:第4卷[C].北京:人民出版社,.239-240.
  • 6编写组.马克思主义哲学原理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1992.92.
  • 7曾隆兴.现代损害赔偿法论[M].,1988.596-601.
  • 8孙彤.组织行为学教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1998.224.
  • 9麻昌华.[D].武汉:武汉大学,2002,160.
  • 10马克思.反杜林论[A]..马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷) [C].北京:人民出版社,1972.74.

共引文献306

同被引文献32

  • 1赵玉杰,师荣光,高怀友,王跃华,陈蕊.农业环境污染事故损失评价方法研究[J].安全与环境学报,2004,4(5):34-37. 被引量:14
  • 2侯瑜,张天柱,温宗国,郑鹏凯.突发水污染事故损失的界定原则[J].环境科学与管理,2006,31(9):135-141. 被引量:3
  • 3ZHAO B,KREUTER U,LI B,et al.An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island,China[J].Land use policy,2004,21:139-148.
  • 4COSTANZA R,D’ARGE R,DE GROOT R,et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:253-260.
  • 5BRANS E H R.Liability for damage to public natural resources[M].New York:Kluwer Law Interantional,2001.
  • 6YANG W,CHANG J,XU B,et al.Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands:A case study in Hangzhou,China[J].Ecological economics,2008,68:116-125.
  • 7ZAFONTE M,HAMPTONL S.Exploring welfare implications of resource equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments[J].Ecological economics,2007,61:134-145.
  • 8CAI M F,LI K M.Economic losses from marine pollution adjacent to Pearl River Estuary,China[J].Procedia engineering,2011,18:43-52.
  • 9OFIARA D.Natural resource damage assessments in the United States rules and procedures for compensation from spills of hazardous Substances and oil in waterways under US jurisdiction[J].Marine pollution bulletin,2002,44:96-110.
  • 10HOU Q,AN X Q,WANG Y,et al.An assessment of China’s PM10-related health economic losses in 2009[J].Science of the total environment,2012,435/436:61-65.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部