摘要
"话语"是承载了一定的意识形态的"陈述",中国管理学界完全可以创建自己的学派,可是如果仍然采用主流的方法,虽然也可以称之为中国学派,但谈不上话语权问题。《试论中国管理研究的话语权问题》基于"话语能力"的所谓"策略"实际上是将"中国管理研究话语权策略"演变成"西方主流管理理论在中国进行扩散的策略"。当然,若将学术本土化演变成学术民族主义,将重点放在对西方主流的价值评判与道德批评上,同样无助于"管理的中国理论"话语权的取得——学术研究的话语权应在学术市场的竞争中取得——因此,其策略就只能是理解、宽容与构建学术竞争的公平市场。
Discourse is the statement which bears a certain ideology.Chinese school of management with mainstream tool has nothing to do with the power of discourse.The strategy based on discourse ability in Li's article is actually the strategy of western mainstream management theory spread in China's strategy.The paper agues that if we evolve academic localization into academic nationalism and focus on academic research in the mainstream value judgments and moral criticism of the Western mainstream management,we will not be able to obtain the power of discourse and academic discourse should be obtained in the competition in the academic market.It concludes that the strategy should be understanding,tolerance and the construction of the fair academic market.
出处
《管理学报》
CSSCI
2011年第1期28-36,41,共10页
Chinese Journal of Management
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(09YJC630180)
湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究资助项目(2010y044)
武汉市社会科学基金资助项目(whsk10005)
湖北企业竞争力研究中心2010年度研究基金资助重点项目(Qyjzl2010zd001)
关键词
管理学
中国管理研究
意识形态
话语权
Chinese management research
a Chinese theory of management
Ideology
power of discourse