期刊文献+

经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中应用单枚融合器和自体骨移植骨融合的疗效分析 被引量:3

The efficacy analysis for the treatment with one cage and excised local bone graft in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究单枚融合器及手术局部自体骨移植行经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)的影像学结果以及临床疗效。方法 76例患者共融合82个节段行TLIF手术。影像学评价包括植骨面积百分比、融合率、椎间盘后高(PH)和腰椎运动节段前凸角(LA);临床疗效评价包括改良Prolo功能评分、疼痛视觉类比评分(VAS)。结果患者均获随访,时间12~32个月。术后腰椎运动节段椎间盘PH、腰椎LA均较术前明显恢复(tPH=2.577,PPH=0.024;tLA=2.249,PLA=0.021);末次随访无明显丢失。植骨面积百分比为40%~75%(53.1%±15.3%);其中融合器占15%~26%(20.4%±5.3%)。融合率达97.6%。根据改良Prolo功能评分:优39例,良32例,可5例,优良率为93.4%。术后VAS较术前降低(t=3.234,P=0.012)。结论应用单枚融合器行TLIF能有效地恢复和维持腰椎的力线与平衡,并提供足够的机械稳定,使绝大多数患者获得优良的临床疗效;手术局部自体骨植骨满足椎体间融合的要求,并避免取髂骨植骨。 Objective To investigate the imaging results and treatment outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) with one cage and excised local bone graft.Methods 76 patients underwent TLIF with one cage and excised local bone graft were studied retrospectively,with a total of 82 levels were performed fusion.The imaging evaluation included ratio of interbody graft area,fusion rate,posterior disc height(PH) and lordosis angle(LA) of motion segment.The treatment outcomes included modified Prolo scale and visual analog scale(VAS).Results All patients were followed-up with a duration of 12~32 months postoperatively.There were significant improvement of PH and LA postoperatively(tPH=2.577,PPH=0.024;tLA=2.249,PLA=0.021),and no significant loss of PH and LA was found at the final follow-up.The interbody graft area was 40%~75%(53.1%±15.3%),and the cage area was corresponded for 15%~26%(20.4%±5.3%);the fusion rate of this series was 97.6%.According to the modified Prolo scale,93.4% of the patients obtained excellent or good result.(excellent:39 patients;good:32 patients;fair:5 patients).The VAS significantly decreased postoperatively(t=3.234,P=0.012).Conclusions TLIF with one cage can restore segmental alignment and balance,and provide excellent stability and stiffness to ensure satisfactory outcomes.Excised local bone graft can satisfy solid interbody fusion without harvesting and grafting the autologous iliac bone.
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2010年第6期605-608,共4页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词 脊柱疾病 脊柱融合术 融合器 植骨 治疗结果 spinal diseases spinal fusion cage bone graft treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1陈维善,朱丹杰,陈其昕,吴琼华,徐侃,陈正形.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的初步疗效[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(16):1102-1103. 被引量:13
  • 2李方财,陈其昕,徐侃,陈维善,吴琼华.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的早中期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(8):580-585. 被引量:31
  • 3Harms J G,Jeszenszky D.The unilateral,transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].Orthop Traumatol,1998,6(1):88 -99.
  • 4Chen H H,Cheung H H,Wang W K,et al.Biomechanical analysis of unilateral fixation with interbody cages[J].Spine,2005,30(15):E92-E96.
  • 5Molinari R W,Sloboda J,Johnstone F L.Are 2 cages needed with instrumented PLIF? A comparison of 1 versus 2 interbody cages in a military population[J].Am J Orthop,2003,32 (7):337-343.
  • 6Fogel G R,Toohey J S,Neidre A,et al.Is one cage enough in posterior lumbar interbody fusion:A comparison of unilateral single cage interbody fusion to bilateral cages?[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(1):60 -65.
  • 7Hackenberg L,Halm H,Bullmann V,et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results[J].Eur Spine J,2005,14 (6):551-558.
  • 8McAfee P C,Devine J G,Chaput C D,et al.The indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis:analysis of 120 cases[J].Spine,2005,30 (6 Suppl):S60-S65.
  • 9Ames C P,Acosta F L Jr,Chi J,et al.Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels[J].Spine,2005,30(19):E562-E566.
  • 10Closkey R F,Parsons J R,Lee C K,et al.Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion:analysis of critical bone graft area[J].Spine,1993,18(8):1011 -1015.

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈维善,朱丹杰,陈其昕,吴琼华,徐侃,陈正形.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的初步疗效[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(16):1102-1103. 被引量:13
  • 2Hee HT, Castro FP, Majd ME et al. Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord, 2001,14:533-540.
  • 3Lowe TG, Tahemia AD. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2002, (394) :64-72.
  • 4Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion : technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery,2001,48:569-575.
  • 5Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion : surgical technique results in 24 patients.Neurosurgery, 2004,54:368-374.
  • 6Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the tlexibilityof the lumbar spine. Spine, 2004, 29 : E65-70.
  • 7Lowe TG, Tahemia AD, O'Brien MF, et al. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion ( TLIF ) :indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech,2002, 15:31-38.
  • 8Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.Spine, 2001, 26:567-571.
  • 9Wang JC, Mummaneni PV, Haid RW. Current treatment strategies for the painful lumbar motion segment: posterolateral fusion versus interbody fusion. Spine, 2005, 30: 33-43.
  • 10Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine, 2004, 29: 726-733.

共引文献38

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部