期刊文献+

论乔纳森·海特的社会直觉主义理论 被引量:11

原文传递
导出
摘要 社会直觉主义是当代美国社会心理学家乔纳森.海特提出的一种较为系统的道德心理学理论,在道德心理学、道德哲学和政治文化研究领域有一定的影响。这一理论主要包括两个组成部分,一是关于道德判断的工作模式,一是关于道德的来源。社会直觉主义有许多值得关注和借鉴的成分,同时也存在一些需要进一步反思和研究的问题。
作者 贾新奇
出处 《道德与文明》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期52-57,共6页 Morality and Civilization
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Haidt,J.,& Bjorklund,F.(2008).Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology.In W.SinnottArmstrong (Ed.),Moral Psychology,Volume 2:The Cognitive Science of Morality:Intuition and Diversity (pp.181-217).Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
  • 2Chartrand,T.L,& Bargh,J.A.(1999).The Chameleon Effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76,893-910.
  • 3Haidt,J.,& Bjorklund,F.(2008).Social Intuitionists Reason,In Conversation.In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.),Moral Psychology,Volume 2:The Cognitive Science of Morality:Intuition and Diversity (pp.241-254).Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2008.
  • 4Haidt,J.,& Kesebir,S.(2010).Morality.In S.Fiske,D.Gilbert & G.Lindzey (Eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology,5th Edition,Hobeken,NJ:Wiley.
  • 5Haidt,J.(2007).The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology.Science,316,998-1002.
  • 6Greene,J.(2008).The Secret Joke of Kant's Soul.In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.),Moral Psychology,Volume 3:The Neuroscience of Morality:Emotion,Disease,and Development (pp.35-79).Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2008.
  • 7张彦彦,陈浩.西方道德心理学研究新进展:道德判断的五基准理论[J].道德与文明,2009(6):28-31. 被引量:14
  • 8Garcia,J.,& Koelling,R.(1966).Relation of Cue to Consequence in Avoidance Learning.Psychonomic Science,4,123-124.
  • 9徐平,迟毓凯.道德判断的社会直觉模型述评[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):403-405. 被引量:34
  • 10何亚云,冯江平.道德理论的新进展——道德判断的社会直觉模式[J].心理科学,2004,27(5):1190-1191. 被引量:16

二级参考文献47

  • 1Pinker S. How the Mind Works. NewYork, NY: WW Norton & Co. , 1997.
  • 2Krebs D L, Denton K. Toward a More Pragmatic Approach to Morality: a Critical Evaluation of Kohlberg's Model. Psychological Review , 2005, 112(3): 629-649.
  • 3Damasio A R. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, NY:G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1994.
  • 4Greene J D, Sommerville R B, Nystrom L E, et al. An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science, 2001, 293: 2105~2108.
  • 5Haidt J. The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: a Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review, 2001, 108: 814~834.
  • 6Shweder R A, Mahapatra M, Miller J G. Culture and Moral Development, Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 130~204.
  • 7Haidt J. The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology. Science, 2007, 316: 998~1002.
  • 8Kurzban R, Tooby J, Cosmides L. Can Race Be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98 (26): 15387~15392.
  • 9Rozin P, Haidt J, MeCauley C, et al. Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity: Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper-and-peneil versus Behavioral Measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 1999, 33(3):330~351.
  • 10Haidt J, Bjorklund F. Social Intuitionists Reason, as a Normal Part of Conversation. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Iversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.

共引文献54

同被引文献128

引证文献11

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部