期刊文献+

我国技术性贸易壁垒的贸易效应——基于行业数据的经验研究 被引量:17

Trade Effects of Technical Barriers to Trade——An Empirical Investigation to China based on Industrial Level Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 技术性贸易壁垒目前使用频繁,其有别于传统贸易壁垒之处在于同时具有贸易限制和贸易促进效应。由于性质复杂和数据难以获得,技术性贸易壁垒被认为是"可以想象到的最难量化的非关税贸易壁垒之一"。本文计算了我国1998~2006年对HS2位数产品进行技术性贸易壁垒进口监管的频数比率,并基于双边贸易数据和重力模型实证检验了我国技术性贸易壁垒等进口监管政策的贸易效应。总体检验发现,技术性贸易壁垒和关税是调控我国进口贸易流量的有效手段。基于行业的分组检验发现,技术性贸易壁垒对农产品行业具有显著的贸易抑制作用,但是,对工业制成品行业反而具有贸易促进作用,而其他传统贸易壁垒并未表现出这种贸易效应的行业差异。最后,本文在实证结论的基础上提出了相关的政策建议。 Technical barriers to trade(TBT) are now widespread, different from any other trade measures, TBT have both trade promotion and trade restriction effects. Due to their theoretical complexity and data scarcity, TBT have been considered as "one of the most difficult NTBs imaginable to quantify". In this paper, we calculate a series of frequency ratio at HS2-digit-level from 1998 to 2006 to examine how TBT and other import control measures imposed by China influence the country's bilateral trade. Then based on the empirical findings derived from the gravity model, we draw some policy implications.
作者 鲍晓华
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第12期7-15,共9页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"技术性贸易壁垒及其自由化的贸易和福利效应测度"(70703021) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目"隐性贸易保护及其对全球贸易体系的影响"(NCET-10-0537) 霍英东教育基金会基础研究课题"技术性贸易壁垒的量化及其经济效应的度量:基于发展中国家的实证检验和政策模拟"(121085) 上海市教委085工程和科研创新重点项目"技术性贸易措施的量化及其对我国对外贸易的影响"(10ZS49)
关键词 技术性贸易壁垒 贸易效应 频数比率 重力模型 technical barriers to trade (TBT) trade effects frequency ratio gravity model
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1AMURGO-PACHECO, Alberto. Mutual Recognition Agreements and Trade Diversion : Consequences for Developing Nations [ Z]. HEI Working Paper No: 20, 2006.
  • 2Anders, Sven M. and Julie A. Caswell. Standards-as-Barriers versus Standards-as-Catalysts : Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports[ Z]. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Working Paper, 2007, (7).
  • 3Baldwin, Richard. Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations and a Two-Tier World Trade System[ Z]. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2574, 2001.
  • 4Cao, K. and R. Johnson. Impacts of Mandatory Meat Hygiene Regulations on the New Zealand Meat Trade [ J ]. Australasian Agribusiness Review, 2006, (14) :3.
  • 5Chen, C, J. Yang, and C. Findlay. Measuring the Effect of Food Safety Standards on China's Agricultural Exports [ J ]. Review of World Economics 2008,144, ( 1 ) :83 - 106.
  • 6Chen, M. X. , Otsuki, T. and Wilson, J. S. Do standards Matter for Export Success? [Z]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3809, 2006.
  • 7Czubala, Witold. , Ben Shepherd and John S. Wilson. Help or Hindrance? The Impact of Harmonized Standards on Mrican Exports[ Z]. The World Bank Working paper, 2007.
  • 8Disdier, A. - C. , Fontagne, L. and M. Mimouni. The impact of Rgulations on Agricultural Trade : Evidence from SPS and TBT Agreements [ J ]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008, 90, (2) : 336 - 350.
  • 9Essaji, Azim. Technical Regulations and Specialization in International Trade[ J]. Journal of International Economics, 2008, (76) :166 - 176.
  • 10Fontagne, L. , Mimouni, M. and J.M. Pasteels. Estimating the Impact of Environmental SPS and TBT on International Trade[J]. Integration and Trade Journal, 2005, 28, (19) :7 -37.

二级参考文献27

共引文献158

同被引文献202

引证文献17

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部