期刊文献+

企业集团统一审计与审计质量 被引量:26

Does Hiring the Same Auditor in a Corporation Group Impair Auditor Independence?
原文传递
导出
摘要 企业集团是新兴市场国家非常普遍的企业组织方式。审计质量问题研究的已有文献通常关注的是单个公司,本文则关注在同一实际控制人控制下的企业集团中,多家上市公司选择同一家会计师事务所审计,即集团统一审计是否会影响审计质量。研究发现,较小规模事务所进行的集团统一审计,其审计质量更差;而较大规模事务所进行的集团统一审计,则未发现其对审计质量产生显著影响。 Business groups are ubiquitous in emerging markets.The conventional wisdom in the literature studying audit issues normally focuses on the single public company.However the majority shareholder might have incentive to control the decision of public companies in the business group.We pay more attention to these public companies in a business group employing the same auditors.We find evidence that hiring the same auditor in a business group would impair auditor independence.In addition,our findings are robust to controlling for unexpected audit fees.Moreover,hiring a Top 10 auditor to audit the public companies in a business group does not impair audit quality.But,auditor independence would be compromised by employing a small auditor.
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第11期65-71,共7页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目批准号70972011) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目"投资者保护导向的审计治理效应(08JA630007)"的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1陈杰平,苏锡嘉,吴溪.异常审计收费与不利审计结果的改善[J].中国会计与财务研究,2005(4):1-54. 被引量:57
  • 2唐跃军,李维安,谢仍明.大股东制衡、信息不对称与外部审计约束——来自2001—2004年中国上市公司的证据[J].审计研究,2006(5):33-39. 被引量:48
  • 3吴联生.审计意见购买:行为特征与监管策略[J].经济研究,2005,40(7):66-76. 被引量:87
  • 4Ashbaugh H.,R.LaFond,B.W.Mayhew.2003.Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence.The Accounting Review,78.
  • 5Becker C.L.,DeFond M.L.,Jiambalvo J.Subramanyam K.R..1998.The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management.Contemporary Accounting Research,15.
  • 6Bushman R.M.,A.J.Smith.2001.Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance.Journal of Accounting and Economics,32.
  • 7Claessens,Djankov,Fan,Lang.2002.Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings.Journal of Finance,57.
  • 8Defond,Raghunandan,Subramanyam.2002.Do Nonaudit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions.Journal of Accounting Research,40.
  • 9DeFond Mark,Wong,Li.1999.The Impact of Improved Auditor Independence on Audit Market Concentration in China.Journal of Accounting and Economics,28.
  • 10Fan,Wong.2002.Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informative Ness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia.Journal of Accounting and Economics,33.

二级参考文献37

  • 1吴联生,谭力.审计师变更决策与审计意见改善[J].审计研究,2005(2):34-40. 被引量:113
  • 2唐跃军,谢仍明.大股东制衡机制与现金股利的隧道效应——来自1999—2003年中国上市公司的证据[J].南开经济研究,2006(1):60-78. 被引量:112
  • 3Antle, R. 1982. The Auditor as an Economic Agent. Journal of Accounting Research 20(2) :503-527.
  • 4Antle, R. 1984. Auditor Independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22(1) : 1-20.
  • 5Baiman, S., J.H. Evans, and N.J. Nagarajan. 1991. Collusion in Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research 29(1):1-18.
  • 6Chow, C. and S. Rice. 1982. Modified Audit Opinions and Auditor Switching. The Accounting Review 57(2) : 326-335.
  • 7Kofman, F. and J. Lawarree. 1993. Collusion in Hierarchical Agency. Econometrica 61 (3) :629-656.
  • 8Kofman, F. and J. Lawarree. 1996. On the Optimality of Allowing Collusion. Journal of Pubic Economies 61(3) :383-407.
  • 9Kriahnan, J. 1994. Auditor Switching and Conservatism. The Accounting Retdew 69(1) : 200-215.
  • 10Kfishnan, J. and R. Stephens. 1995. Evidence on Opinion Shopping from Audit Opinion Conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 14(3) : 179-201.

共引文献174

同被引文献417

引证文献26

二级引证文献366

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部