h指数在人文社会学科中的评价表征能力：期刊视角的实证

h-index＇s Characterization Ability in Humanities and Social Science：An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Journals

对前人理论推导和实证分析的文献研究表明：h指数可能具有对传统定量评价指标和定性评价方法的综合表征能力。以法学,管理学,教育学,经济学,历史学,马克思主义,民族学,体育学,图书馆、情报与文献学,新闻学与传播学,艺术学,语言学,哲学,政治学,中国文学共15个学科的346种期刊为样本,研究h指数的表征能力在人文社会学科的具体表现及差异。结果显示：h指数的表征能力在体育学等13个学科中都有不同程度体现,但在马克思主义和民族学没有得到证实。此能力没有表现出与学科期刊规模相关,但与学科性质是＂社会＂、＂人文＂或＂哲学＂有粗略关联,并在图书馆、情报与文献学和管理学内不同水平期刊间保持稳定,但在法学等6个学科存在差异。

Based on previous theory and empirical research,we suppose that h-index may have a comprehensive characterization ability of the traditional quantitative evaluation indices and qualitative evaluation methods.Taking 346 journals including Law,Management,Education,Economics,History,Marxist,Ethnology,Sports science,Library and Information science,Journalism and Communication,Art studies,Linguistics,Philosophy,Politics,Chinese literature,totally 15 disciplines as example,the concrete manifestation and difference of h-index＇s characterization ability in Humanities and Social science is studied.The results show that h-index＇s characterization ability is,reflected Sports science and other 13 disciplines in varying degrees,except Marxism and Ethnology.A rudeness association between h-index＇s characterization ability and discipline nature has been found,but there is no correlation between h- index＇s characterization ability and journal scale of discipline.Moreover,h-index＇s characterization ability can keep stable at different levels of journals in Library and Information science as well as in Management.But there are differences in Law and other 6 disciplines.