期刊文献+

论ECFA框架下两岸经贸争端解决机制的建构 被引量:10

On the Construction of the Economy and Trade Dispute Settlement Mechanism Between the Both Sides under ECFA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2010年6月29日,《海峡两岸经济合作框架协议》(ECFA)正式签定,ECFA框架下建构两岸经贸争端解决机制的重要性也日显凸出。在借鉴现有的争端解决机制的基础上,结合两岸关系的特殊性,两岸经贸争端解决机制的适用主体应有其特殊性,调整的客体范围可考虑包括货物贸易争端、服务贸易争端、投资争端、知识产权争端等各领域,ADR在解决两岸经贸争端中应广泛采用。 on June 29^(th),2010,Cross-straits Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement(ECFA) was signed formally, with that,the construction of the Economic and Trade Dispute Settlement Mechanism between the Both Sides has been increasingly found important.By using the experience of the existing dispute resolution mechanisms,according to the specialty of Cross-straits Relations,the subject of application of the Economic and Trade Dispute Settlement Mechanism between the Both Sides should have its particularity,and its object scope may cover the each field such as goods trade dispute,services trade dispute,investment dispute and intellectual property dispute,and ADR should be put to use widely.
作者 彭莉
出处 《台湾研究集刊》 CSSCI 2010年第6期43-53,共11页 Taiwan Research Journal
关键词 ECFA 争端解决机制 运行模式 ECFA dispute solution mechanism operation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献45

  • 1史先社.解析世界贸易组织争端解决机制及其新发展[J].上海大学学报(自然科学版),2001,7(S1):41-48. 被引量:1
  • 2慕亚平,肖丽.应当构建CEPA下的争端解决机制[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2004,44(4):44-48. 被引量:27
  • 3叶兴平.《北美自由贸易协定》争端解决机制的创新及意义[J].当代法学,2002,16(7):83-88. 被引量:10
  • 4纪文华,黄萃.WTO与FTA争端解决管辖权的竞合与协调[J].法学,2006(7):37-42. 被引量:15
  • 5Can. -Chile Free Trade Agreement, June 2, 1997, Can. -Chile, art. N - 18, at http://www.siee. oas. org.
  • 6Can. - Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement, Apr. 23, 2001, Can. -Costa Rica, art. XIII(6), at www. dfait - maeci, gc. ca.
  • 7Chile- Mex. Free Trade Agreement, Apr. 17, 1998,Chile - Mex. , art. 18 -03, at http://www.sice. oas. org.
  • 8Mex. - Northern Triangle Free Trade Agreement, June 29, 2000, art. 19 -03, at http://www. sice. oas. org. For examples of dispute settlement provisions similar to NAFTA art. 2005
  • 9U.S. - Chile Free Trade Agreement, June 6, 2003,U.S. - Chile, ch. 22, at http ://www. sice. oas. org; U.S. - Sing. Free Trade Agreement, May 6, 2003, U.S. - Sing. at http ://www. sice. oas. org.
  • 10Michael Reisman and Mark Wiedman:Contextual Imperative of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms, Some Hypotheses and their Application in the Uruguay Round and NAFTA, Journal of World Trade Vol. 29. p. 15, 22, 10.

共引文献81

同被引文献120

引证文献10

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部