期刊文献+

江苏省南通市港闸区居民健康素养干预效果分析 被引量:3

Analysis On Intervention Effects Of Residents' Health Literacy Monitoring In Gangzha District,Nantong City,Jiangsu Province
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解南通市港闸区居民健康素养现况,探索社区健康素养促进工作方法。方法以健康知识讲座、广场活动、发放健康知识宣传品等方式,对南通市港闸区15~69岁的社区常住居民进行6个月左右的健康教育工作,并在干预前后对社区居民健康素养的知识与技能进行评估。结果干预后居民的健康素养基本知识和理念知晓率提高了6.91%;生活方式与行为正确率提高了1.73%;健康技能正确率提高了18.23%。结论居民关注度高的健康问题知晓率高。实用简便的健康技能的干预效果好于日常生活方式的行为干预。 Objective To understand the status of residents' health literacy, and explore the ways to promote community health literacy. Methods Through health knowledge forums, square activities and the distribution of propagandistic products relating to health knowledge, health promotion were conducted for six months among permanent residents aged between 15 -69 in all communities in Gangzha. And residents'knowledge and skills relating to health literacy were evaluated before and after the intervention. Results After the intervention, the awareness rate of residents'knowledge and ideas about health literacy increased by 6.91% , the accurate rate of life style and behaviours increased by 1.73% , and the accurate rate of health skills increased by 18.23%. Conclusion The more the concerns, the higher the answer rate of residents'knowl- edge. The interventional effect of some practical health skills are better than the intervention of daily life - style and behaviours.
作者 陆俊华
出处 《安徽预防医学杂志》 2010年第6期453-455,472,共4页 Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 健康素养 知识 行为 技能 干预 Health literacy Knowledge Behaviour Skills Intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献5

共引文献15

同被引文献54

  • 1刘丽,高晶蓉,胡亚飞,陈润洁.健康素养的进展、挑战及展望[J].健康教育与健康促进,2012,7(1):38-41. 被引量:10
  • 2蔡忠元,陈婷,袁江杰,杨来宝.健康素养题库不同题型对评价结果的影响[J].健康教育与健康促进,2010,5(1):1-4. 被引量:15
  • 3陈丽琴.临沂市居民健康素养监测与强化干预效果评价的研究[J].健康教育与健康促进,2010,5(3):190-192. 被引量:3
  • 4费新军,张春道,钱正军.2012年连云港市城乡居民健康素养干预和效果评估[J].健康教育与健康促进,2013,8(5):338-341. 被引量:5
  • 5唐秋英.深圳市外来工孕产妇贫血对妊娠的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,16(22):1105-1106.
  • 6Vernon JA, Trujillo A, Rosenbaum S,DeBuono B. Low health literacy:Implications for national health policy [R]. Washington, DC: George Washington Uni- versity,School of Public Health and Health Services, 2007.
  • 7Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interven- tions: the RE-AIM framework [J].Am J Public Health, 1999, 89 (9):1322-1327.
  • 8Glasgow Using RE-AIM agement support RE, Nelson CC, Strycker LA, et al. metrics to evaluate diabetes self-man- interventions[J].Am J Prev Med, 2006,30 (1):67-73.
  • 9Glasgow RE, Gaglio B, Estabrooks PA, et al. Long-term results of a smoking reduction program[J]. Med Care, 2009, 47(1):115-120.
  • 10Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, et al. Ap- plying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change [J].Ann Behav Med, 2007,34 (2):105-114.

引证文献3

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部