期刊文献+

曹端对朱子“太极”之阐发及其诠释学意义

Caoduan's Interpretation to Zhuxi's Taichi and Its Meaning in Hermeneutics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 曹端认为朱熹的学理体系对太极动静的内涵没有很好把握,从而产生了"自相龃龉"的说法。其《辩戾》在继承朱子太极学说的基础上,从自身真实的生命与智慧出发,提出了独到的理解与创见。他对朱子"太极"的阐发,不仅深入了学术层次,也体现出明初理学发展的问题意识及理论特色;不但是宋儒疑经思潮的继承和理学诠释学理论的大综合,也将时代背景融入到学术研究之中,成为中国古代诠释学理论发展的一个高峰。 Caoduan held the view that Zhuxi' s Neo-confucianism didn' t grasp the connotation of Taichi, which produced the paradoxical claim. On the basis of inheriting Zhuxi' s theory, Cao put forward his original understanding and innovative ideas. His interpretation not only thoroughted academic level but also reflected the questioning consciousness and theoretical features to develop Neo-confucianism in early Ming Dynasty. It not only is a large comprehensive generalization of the inheriting of Song confucian' s suspect trend and Neo- confucianism hermeneutics theory but also puts age background into academic research, thus becomes the peak of ancient Chinese hermeneutic theory.
作者 王蕾
出处 《河南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第6期5-9,共5页 Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
基金 2009年度河南省社科规划项目(2009BZX007) 商丘师院青年基金项目(2009QN06)
关键词 曹端 朱熹 太极 理学 Caoduan Zhuxi Taichi Neo-confucianism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1清·张廷玉.明史[M].北京:中华书局,1974..
  • 2宋·周敦颐.周敦颐集[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2002.8.
  • 3宋·朱熹.朱熹集[M].成都:四川教育出版社,1996:1682.

共引文献245

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部