期刊文献+

语言测试的主要研究范式及其发展趋势 被引量:9

Major Inquiry Paradigms of Language Testing Research and Future Trends
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究范式是指导某一领域研究的本体论、认识论和方法论的立场、观点的总和。社会科学领域的四大研究范式,即实证主义、后实证主义、批判理论以及建构主义,对包括语言测试在内的社会科学各学科都有着极其重要的指导作用。由于语言测试的核心活动是测量,因而长期以来,该领域一直受到实证主义范式的支配。然而近年来,受社会科学领域研究范式发展的影响,语言测试领域的研究范式也开始呈现出多元化、综合化的特征。但考虑到测试活动的本质属性等因素,实证主义和后实证主义范式仍将支配这一领域未来的研究;而批判理论和建构主义研究范式也将通过与传统范式相结合等方式,对测试研究产生持续的影响。 An inquiry paradigm is the sum of positions and beliefs on ontological, epistemotogical and methodological levels that drive the research in a certain field. The four major research paradigms of social sciences,namely,positivism,postpositivism,critical theory and constructivism, have a powerful influence over all research fields within social sciences, including the field of language testing. With measurement as its core activity,language testing has, for a long time, been dominated by positivism. However, over the last few decades,influenced by the development of inquiry paradigms in social sciences,a richer variety of paradigms has appeared in language testing. However,owing to factors such as the essential attribute of language testing,in the future positivism and postpositivism will most likely retain their dominance in the field. Studies featuring a mixed-paradigm, namely a combination of alternative paradigms such as critical theory and constructivism, and the more traditional paradigms, will also have a lasting influence on language testing research.
作者 何莲珍 李航
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期131-139,共9页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(10BYY092)
关键词 语言测试 研究范式 实证主义 混合研究范式 language testing inquiry paradigm positivism mixed-paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1王爱琴,余国兴.语言测试:“可靠的”现代主义对“负责的”后现代主义的青睐[J].外语教学,2004,25(4):25-29. 被引量:1
  • 2L.F.Bachman,A.S.Pal mer.″The Construct Validation of the FSI Oral Interview,″. Language Learning Journal . 1981
  • 3L.F.Bachman,A.S.Pal mer.″The Construct Validation of Some Components of CommunicativeProficiency,″. Tesol Quarterly . 1982
  • 4L.Llosa.″Validating a Standards-Based Classroom Assessment of English Proficiency:A Multitrait-Multi methodApproach,″. Language Testing . 2007
  • 5Y.Sawaki.″Construct Validation of Analytic Rating Scales in a Speaking Assessment:Reporting a ScoreProfile and a Composite,″. Language Testing . 2007
  • 6A.Strauss.Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. . 1987
  • 7G.Fulcher.″Does Thick Description Lead to Smart Tests?A Data-Based Approach to Rating ScaleConstruction,″. Language Testing . 1996
  • 8U.Knoch.″Diagnostic Assessment of Writing:A Comparison of Two Rating Scales,″. Language Testing . 2009
  • 9Y.Wu.″What Do Tests of Listening Comprehension Test?A Retrospection Study of EFL Test-TakersPerforming a Multiple-Choice Task,″. Language Testing . 1998
  • 10G.J.Ockey.″Construct I mplications of Including Still I mage or Video in Computer-Based Listening Tests,″. Language Testing . 2007

二级参考文献60

  • 1Gregg, K. R. Second Language Acquisition theory: The case for a generative perspective[A].In S.M.Gass & J.Schachter (eds.). Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989:15-40.
  • 2Gregg, K. R. Taking explanation seriously: Or let a couple of flowers bloom[J].Applied Linguistics,1993(14).
  • 3Lantolf, J. P. Review Article. SLA theory building: "Letting all the flowers bloom !"[J]. Language Learning, 1996(46):713-49.
  • 4Lewy, A. Postmodernism in the field of achievement testing[J].Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1996(22):223-244.
  • 5Long, M. H. Input and second language acquisition theory[A].In S. M. Gass &C.G. Madden (eds.).Input in Second Language Acquisition Theory[C]. Rowley, MA: Newbury House,1985:377-393.
  • 6Long, M. H. The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 1990(24) :649-666.
  • 7Long, M. H. Assessment strategies for second language acquisition theories[J]. Applied Linguistics, 1993(14): 225-249.
  • 8Lyotard, J. F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge[M]. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
  • 9McNamara, T. Policy and social considerations in language assessment[J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1998 (18) :304-319.
  • 10McNamara, T. Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research[J]. Language Testing, 2001(18): 333-349.

同被引文献176

引证文献9

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部