期刊文献+

中国钢铁行业全要素生产效率实证分析 被引量:6

An Empirical Research on Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Steel Sector
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于动态DEA的非参数Malmquist指数法,分析了1992~2007年中国28个省市钢铁行业全要素生产率以及七大经济区钢铁行业全要素生产率变动情况,并将全要素生产率的变动分解为技术进步、纯技术效率、规模效率三个指标,分析了这三个指标对中国钢铁行业全要素生产率的影响。结果显示,中国钢铁行业TFP的增长主要是由技术进步推动的,当技术进步促进TFP提升时,总会受到技术效率相对下降对TFP增长的抑制;七大经济区钢铁行业全要素生产率存在明显级差,低效经济区学习和追赶高效经济区的效应也应该发挥更大作用;钢铁产业各经济区产能应实现在高效率地区的相对集中,获取行业的规模经济;各经济区都应该注重钢铁行业管理水平的提高,突破钢铁行业能效提高的技术效率瓶颈。 Using the Malmquist index approach based total factor productivity (TFP) of Chinese steel sector on data envelopment analysis ( DEA), this paper measures basing 1992 to 2007. The structure of TFP is decomposed into on provincial level and 7 economic regions level from technical progress, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency. The result indicates that the growth of TFP of Chinese steel sector mainly promoted by technical progress, the decline in technical efficiency has inhibitory effect on the growth of TFP;obvious divergence of TFP of Chinese steel sector in 7 economic regions exist, learning effect should play a gigantic role in inefficient economic regions;scale economy should be achieved through adjusting production and a breakthrough in technical efficiency should be created through improving management in 7 economic regions.
作者 陈凯 史红亮
出处 《经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期94-100,共7页 On Economic Problems
基金 上海财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目(CXJJ-2009-302)
关键词 钢铁 全要素生产率 MALMQUIST生产率指数 技术进步 技术效率 steel total factor productivity Malmquist productivity index technological change technical efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Kambara. The Enegry Situation in China [ J ]. China Q, 1992, ( 131 ) :608 -636.
  • 2Huang. Industry Energy Use and Structural Change: a Case Study of The People' s Republic of China [ J ]. Energy Economics, 1993, ( 15 ) : 131 - 136.
  • 3Sinton, Levine. Changing Energy Intensity in Chinese Industry : the Relative Importance of Structural Shift and Intensity Change[J]. Energy Policy,1994, (22) :239 -255.
  • 4Garbaccio, Jorgenson. Why Has the Energy-output Ratio Fallen in China[J]. Energy, 1999, (20) :63 -91.
  • 5Zhang. Why did the Energy Intensity Fall in China' s Industrial Sector in the 1990s [ J ] . Energy Economics, 2003, (25) :625 -638.
  • 6Jenne CA, Cattell R K. Structural Change and Energy Efficiency in Industry [ J]. Energy Economics, 1983, (5) : 14 - 23.
  • 7Farla J, Cuelenaere R, Blok K. Energy Efficiency and Structural Change in the Netherlands, 1980 - 1990 [ J]. Energy Economics, 1998,(20) : 1 - 28.
  • 8韩智勇,魏一鸣,范英.中国能源强度与经济结构变化特征研究[J].数理统计与管理,2004,23(1):1-6. 被引量:292
  • 9Richard F, Garbaccio, et al. Why Has the Energy- Output Ratio Fallen in China [J]. Energy Journal, 1999, (13) :70 -88.
  • 10吴巧生,成金华.中国工业化中的能源消耗强度变动及因素分析——基于分解模型的实证分析[J].财经研究,2006,32(6):75-85. 被引量:148

二级参考文献141

共引文献6649

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部