期刊文献+

理解教育政策的意义——质性取向在政策研究中的定位 被引量:25

Making Sense of Education Policy:The Status of Qualitative Approach in Policy Studies in Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 量化研究在教育政策研究的主导地位,在过去三十年受到质性研究的挑战;其中最重要的挑战就是,无论在教育政策制定、实施还是评鉴过程中,政策参与者特别是政策受众,对有关政策所赋予的主观意义对政策的成败至为重要。本文正是以教育政策研究中量化与质性研究取向的争论作起点,整理质性研究中三个方法学取向(现象学、语言学、诠释学)之间的关联,并尝试建构出一个整合的质性研究的指导架构,以作为质性研究在教育政策研究定位的参考。 The dominance of quantitative approach in educational policy research has been challenged by qualitative approach for the past three decades.One of the most prominent challenges from qualitative researchers is their emphasis on the importance of participants' subjective meanings attached to the education policy concerned.It has been well documented in recent decades that how participants,especially policy recipients, make sense of the policy has been of vital importance to the efficacy of the policy outcome.Taking this debate between quantitative and qualitative approaches as the starting point,this essay is set out to review and synthesize three methodological approaches in qualitative research,namely phenomenological,linguistic and hermeneutic approaches.It attempts to integrate these approaches into one comprehensive qualitative research framework,which may help qualitative researchers to locate or even justify their contributions to the field of policy studies in education.
作者 曾荣光
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期152-180,192,共29页 Peking University Education Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献97

  • 1曾荣光.教育政策研究:议论批判的视域[J].北京大学教育评论,2007,5(4):2-30. 被引量:56
  • 2Bauman, Zygmunt. (1978). Hermeneutics and social Science: Approaches to understanding. London: Hutchinson.
  • 3Berger, Peter & Thomas Luckmann. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Pennguin.
  • 4Brinton, Mary C. & Victor Nee. (Eds.). (1998). The New Institutionalism in sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • 5Bruner, Jerome. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
  • 6Campbell, John L. & Ore K. Pedersen. (Eds.). (2001). The rise of Neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 7Campbell, John L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 8Clark, Jon. (Ed.). (1996). James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.
  • 9Coleman, James S. (1990). Equality and achievement in education. Boudler: Westview.
  • 10Curry, Patrick. (2006). Ecological ethics : An introduction. Cambridge: Polity.

二级参考文献99

  • 1曾荣光.从教育质量到质量教育的议论——香港特区的经验与教训[J].北京大学教育评论,2006,4(1):129-144. 被引量:36
  • 2Lasswell, H.D. (1980). Harold D. Lasswell on Political Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 3Lasswell, H.D. (1951). "Policy Orientation. " in D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell (Eds.) The Policy Sciences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press,10.
  • 4deleon, P. ( 1988 ). Advice and consent: The development of the policy sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • 5Yanow, D. ( 2000 ). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oak : Sage Publications, 17.
  • 6Easton, D. ( 1953 ). The political system, an inquiry into the state of political science. New York: Knopf, 129.
  • 7Kant, I. (1961). Critique of pure reason. New York: St. Martin Press,9.
  • 8Hoy, D.C. and T. McCarthy (1994). Critical theory. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press,9.
  • 9Horkhiemer, M. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum. ( Original work published in 1944)
  • 10Foucauh, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon. (Original work published in 1975).

共引文献55

同被引文献494

引证文献25

二级引证文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部