期刊文献+

中药浸浴及内服结合康复训练治疗中风后肢体痉挛60例 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察中药浸浴及内服柔筋汤结合康复训练治疗中风偏瘫对痉挛程度、偏瘫运动功能及日常生活活动能力的影响。方法:120例中风患者随机分组,对照组采用常规康复训练,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上加用柔筋汤内服,柔筋解痉、通经活络中药外用浸浴。评价指标采用修订Ashworth量表(MAS)、Fugl-Meyer量表(FMA)、Barthel指数(BI)。结果:两组治疗后上、下肢MAS评分均明显下降,具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组下降更明显,疗效优于对照组(P<0.01);治疗组在治疗后FMA评分显著高于对照组(P<0.01);治疗组治疗后BI也明显提高,改善优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:该综合疗法能降低中风患者的偏瘫痉挛程度,从而改善运动功能,提高日常生活活动能力。
出处 《山东中医杂志》 2011年第1期18-20,共3页 Shandong Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1Lance JM. Pathophysiology of spasticity and clinical experience with baclofen[M]. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1980.
  • 2Moberg-Wolff EA. Spasticity[M]. Emedicine,2006.
  • 3Blackburn M, Van Vliet P, Mockett SP. Reliability of Measurements Obtained With the Modified Ashworth Scale in the Lower Extremities of People With Stroke[J]. Phys Ther( S0031 - 9023), 2002,82 : 25 - 34.
  • 4Bohannon RW,Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity[J]. Phys Ther (S0031-9023),1987,67:206-207.
  • 5Pandyan AD,Johnson GR,Price CIM,et al. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and the modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity[J]. Clin Rehabil (S0269- 2155), 1999,13(5) : 373 - 383.
  • 6Katz RT. Objective quantification of spastic hypertonia. Correlation with clinical findings[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil(S0003-9993),1992,73:339-347.
  • 7Bajd T,Vodovnik L. Pendulum testing of spasticity[J]. J Biomed Eng(S0141-5425),1984,6:9-16.
  • 8Bakheit AMO, Maynard VA, Curnow J, et al. The relation between excitability of the alpha motor neurons in patients with post-stroke spasticity[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry(S0022-3050), 2003,74 : 646 - 648.
  • 9Gregson J, Leathley M, Moore P, et al. Reliability of measurement of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients [J]. Age Ageing(S0002 - 0729), 2000,29 : 223- 228.
  • 10Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D. Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study[J]. Clin Rehabil(S0269 - 2155), 2005,19 : 751 - 759.

共引文献36879

同被引文献72

引证文献5

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部