1SCHEPANSKI, A. & KELSEY, D., 1990, Testing for Framing Effects in Taxpayer Compliance Decisions, The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 12.
2SCHEPANSKI, A. & SHEARER, T., 1995, A Prospect Theory Account of the Income Tax Withholding Phenomenon, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63.
3BALDRY, J.C., 1987, Income Tax Evasion and the Tax Schedule: Some Experimental Results, Public Finance, 42.
4KAHNEMAN, D. & TVERSKY, A., 1979, Prospect Theory: an Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica, 47.
5SCHMIDT, D.R., 2001, The Prospects of Taxpayer Agreemerit with Aggressive Tax Advice, Journal of Economic Psychology, 22.
6KIRCHLER, E. & MACIEJOVSKY, B., 2001, Tax Compliance within the Context of Gain and Loss Situations, Expected and Current Asset Position, and Profession, Journal of Economic Psychology, 22.
7CULLIS, J., etc., 2006, Tax Framing, Instrumentality and Individual Differences: Are There Two Different Cultures?, Journal of Economic Psychology, 27.
8HASSELDINE, J. & HITEM, EA., 2003, Framing, Gender and Tax Compliance, Journal of Economic Psychology, 24.
9HOLLER, M., etc., 2008, Framing of Information on the Use of Public Finances, Regulatory Fit of Recipients and Tax Compliance, Journal of Economic Psychology, 29.
10CHANG, O.H. & SCHULTZ, J.J., 1990, The Income Tax Withholding Phenomenon: Evidence from TCMP Data, Journal of the American Taxation Association, 12.
二级参考文献4
1Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 3(1979), 263-291.
2Schmidt, D.. The prospects of taxpayer agreement with aggressive tax advice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2001), 157-172.
3Schepanski, A. ,Shearer, T. A prospect theory account of the income tax withholding phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(1995), 174-186.
4Schepanski, A,, Kelsey, D.. Testing for framing effects in taxpayer compliance decisions. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 12(1990),60-77.
