期刊文献+

螺旋断层放疗鼻咽癌2年经验总结 被引量:3

Two-year experiences in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with helical tomotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结解放军总医院螺旋断层放疗鼻咽癌的2年临床经验及近期结果。方法 2007年9月-2009年9月间收治73例初治鼻咽癌患者,其中单纯放疗24例,同步综合治疗49例。处方剂量:原发灶及转移淋巴结计划靶区70-74Gy/33F,高危计划靶区60-62.7Gy/33F,低危计划靶区52-56Gy/33F。根据RTOG/EORTC标准评价急性反应。结果平均出束治疗时间为468.8s。放疗急性反应发生率:皮肤0级2.7%,1级76.7%,2级13.8%,3级6.8%;口腔黏膜0级1.4%,1级32.9%,2级60.2%,3级5.5%;口干0级4.0%,1级45.3%,2级50.7%。口干症随时间逐渐缓解,至放疗结束后1年无≥2级口干。同步化疗显著增加了急性反应。放疗结束1月时,鼻咽原发病灶及颈部转移性淋巴结消退率分别为91.8%和98.1%。中位随访时间14.8个月。2例患者放疗结束后肿瘤局部复发,2例患者出现远处转移。1年无复发生存率、无远处转移生存率及总生存率分别为95.6%、97.2%和94.8%。结论鼻咽癌螺旋断层放疗是一种高效、安全、有效的治疗方式。 Objective To summarize the experience in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) with helical tomotherapy in our hospital.Methods Of the 73 NPC patients admitted to our hospital from September 2007 and September 2009,24 were treated with simple tomotherapy,49 were treated with combined tomotherapy and medical therapy.The tomotherapy dose was 70–74Gy/33F for primary tumor and metastatic lymph node target region,60–62.7Gy/33F for high risk target region,and 52–56Gy/33F for low risk target region,respectively.Acute side-effects were evaluated following the established RTOG/EORTC criteria.Results The average beam-on time was 468.8s.The incidence rate of skin toxicity was 2.7%,76.7%,13.8% and 6.8%,respectively for grades 0-3.The incidence rate of oral mucositis was 1.4%,32.9%,60.2% and 5.5%,respectively for grades 0-3.The incidence rate of xerostomia was 4.0%,45.3% and 50.7%,respectively for grades 0-2.Xerostomia relived gradually with time and no grade 2 or higher xerostomia was noted one year after tomotherapy.Combined tomotherapy and chemotherapy significantly increased the incidence of severe acute side effects.One month after tomotherapy,the remission rate of NPC and lymph node metastasis was 91.8% and 98.1%,respectively.The median follow-up was 14.8 months.Two patients had a local recurrence and 2 patients developed distant metastasis.The relapse-free survival,distant metastasis-free survival and one-year overall survival rates were 95.6% 97.2% and 94.8%,respectively.Conclusion As a curative treatment modality,helical tomotherapy is effective and safe for NPC.
出处 《军医进修学院学报》 CAS 2011年第1期48-51,共4页 Academic Journal of Pla Postgraduate Medical School
关键词 鼻咽癌 断层调强放疗 急性反应 生存率 Nasopharyngeal Cancer Helical Tomotherapy Acute Toxicities Survival
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1王树森,管忠震,向燕群,姜文奇,林桐榆,张力.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂Gefitinib对鼻咽癌荷瘤裸鼠移植瘤生长作用的实验研究[J].癌症,2004,23(z1):1365-1369. 被引量:9
  • 2赵充,卢泰祥,韩非,卢丽霞,黄劭敏,邓小武,林承光,崔念基.139例鼻咽癌调强放疗的临床研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(1):1-6. 被引量:154
  • 3何侠,翟振宇,纪红,张宜勤.初治鼻咽癌调强适形放疗近期临床观察[J].肿瘤防治研究,2006,33(4):272-274. 被引量:31
  • 4袁智勇,高黎,徐国镇,易俊林,黄晓东,罗京伟,李素艳,戴建荣.初治鼻咽癌调强放疗的初步结果[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(4):237-243. 被引量:84
  • 5Lee N, Puri DR, Blanco AI, et al. Intensity-Modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: an update. Head Neck,2007, 29:387-400.
  • 6Mackie TR, Holmes T, Swerdloff S, et al. Tomotherapy : a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. Med Phys, 1993,20 : 1709-1719.
  • 7Van Vulpen M, Field C, Raaijmakers CP, et al. Comparing stepand-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical Tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005,62: 1535-1539.
  • 8Sheng K, Molloy JA, Read PW. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,65: 917-923.
  • 9Hart C, Liu A, Schultheiss TE, et al. Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy treatment plans and step-and-shoot intensitymodulated radiosurgery treatment plans in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,65: 608-616.
  • 10Sheng K,Molloy JA,Larnera JM,et al. A dosimetric comparison of non-coplanar IMRT versus Helical Tomotherapy for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer. Radiother Oncol,2007,82 : 174-178.

共引文献134

同被引文献48

  • 1孙永敏,陈刚,江瑞霞,毕文,于金明.比亚芬预防放射性皮肤损伤的疗效观察[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2004,13(4):316-318. 被引量:110
  • 2殷尉伯,余子豪,徐国镇,等.肿瘤放射治疗学[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2008.999-1003.
  • 3Roy I, Fortin A, Larochelle M. The impact of skin washing with water and soap during breast irradiation : a randomized study [ J ] . Radiother Oncol, 2001, 58 ( 3 ) : 333-339.
  • 4Maddocks-Jennings W, Wilkinson JM, Shillington D. Novel approaches to radiotherapy-induced skin reactions : a literature review [ J ]. Complement Ther Clin Praet, 2005, 11 ( 4 ) : 224- 231.
  • 5Vano-Galvan S, Fernandez-Lizarbe E, Truchuelo M, et al. Dynamic skin changes of acute radiation dermatitis revealed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy [ J ] . J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2013, 27 (9): 1143-1150.
  • 6Bolderston A, Lloyd NS, Wong RK, et al. The prevention and management of acute skin reactions related to radiation therapy : a systematic review and practice guideline [ J ] . Support Care Cancer, 2006, 14 ( 8 ) : 802-817.
  • 7殷蔚伯,余子豪,徐国镇,等.肿瘤放射治疗学(4版)[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2007:474.
  • 8Lee TF, Fang FM, Chao P J, et al. Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2008, 89(1): 89-96.
  • 9Nguyen NP, Ceizyk M, Vinh-Hung V, et al. Feasibility of tomotherapy to reduce cochlea radiation dose in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer[J]. Tumori, 2012, 98(6): 709-14.
  • 10杜镭,马林,冯林春,等.113例鼻咽癌螺旋断层放疗结果[c]//第六届全国鼻咽癌学术大会论文汇编.2010:31-7.

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部