期刊文献+

学术影响力评价指标之间的相关性分析——基于医学领域某一细分学科的视角 被引量:6

The Relationship Analysis among Academic Influence Evaluation Indicators——Based on the Perspective of a Specific Discipline in Medical Field
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着科学计量学和科研评价实践的发展,以h指数为代表的学术影响力评价指标不断发展完善,诸多学者对其与以影响因子为代表的传统计量学指标的相关性进行了研究。然而很多或未考虑研究对象的一致性(如期刊在相同时间区域的载文),或未考虑跨学科比较的差异性等。本研究选择JCR2009年版收录的心脏与心血管系统学科下的期刊为对象,统计各期刊的载文量、总被引次数、影响因子、特征因子、h指数和相对h指数6个指标数据,并对其进行相关性分析,从而了解医学领域某一细分学科学术影响力指标之间的相互关系,以期为实际应用时提供理论基础与事实依据。 With the development of scientometrics and scientific evaluation practice, the academic influence evaluation indicators represented by h-index continued to evolve,and were compared with the traditional bibliometries evaluation indicators such as impact factor by many scholars. However, many of those studies didn't consider the consistency of sample(such as journal papers in the same time zone). This paper selected all journals of Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems included by JCR 2009 ,and gathered statistics of journal papers, total citation counts,impact factor, eigenfaetor, h-index, and relative h-index as well as the relationship among them, so as to understand the relationship between indicators in specific discipline and to provide theoretical foundation and basis for the practical application.
作者 杜建 张玢
出处 《评价与管理》 2010年第4期68-76,50,共10页 Evaluation & Management
基金 中国医学科学院医学信息研究所中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费<基于引证分析的学术影响力理论与实践研究>(项目编号:09R0216)的研究成果
关键词 期刊H指数 相对H指数 特征因子 学术影响力 相关性分析 Journals h-index Relative h-index Eigenfactor Academic influence Correlation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. PNAS,2005,102(46) : 16569-16572.
  • 2Alonsoa S,Cabretizob F J, Herrera-Viedma E. et al. h-Index.- A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2009,3 (4) : 273-289.
  • 3赵星,高小强,郭吉安,陶乃航.基于主题词频和g指数的研究热点分析方法[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(2):59-61. 被引量:33
  • 4Braun T, Glanzel W, Schubert A. A Hirsch-type Index for Journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2006,69(1) : 169-173.
  • 5Rousseau R. A case study: evolution of JASIS' s Hirsch index[J]. Science focus(in Chinese) ,2006,1 (1) : 16-17.
  • 6Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor: measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals[J]. College & Research Libraries News,2007,68(5) :314-316.
  • 7Cronin B. ,Meho L. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57 (9) : 1275-1278.
  • 8Van Raan. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups [J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 67 (3) :491-502.
  • 9陈红光,雷二庆.中国SCI期刊的h指数与影响因子比较[J].中国科技期刊研究,2008,19(3):402-404. 被引量:23
  • 10赵星.期刊引文评价新指标Eigenfactor的特性研究——基于我国期刊的实证[J].情报理论与实践,2009,32(8):53-56. 被引量:38

二级参考文献70

共引文献214

同被引文献129

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部