期刊文献+

多发性创伤伴失血性休克限制性液体复苏的疗效分析 被引量:7

Therapeutic effects of limiting fluid resuscitation on multiple injure and traumatic hemorrhagic shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价多发性创伤伴失血性休克早期采用限制性液体复苏(LFR)的治疗效果,以提高治愈率。方法将50例多发性创伤伴失血性休克患者随机分为LFR组和积极液体复苏(AFR)组,采用两组不同复苏方式,对两组患者的血乳酸(LA)、剩余碱(BE)、输入液体量进行统计学分析,对比两组的临床疗效。结果采用两种不同复苏方式治疗后,血乳酸[手术开始时:(3.26±0.52)mmol/Lvs(5.71±0.58)mmol/L;术后3小时:(2.35±0.36)mmol/Lvs(3.87±0.24)mmol/L]和剩余碱[手术开始时:(-5.56±0.49)mmol/Lvs(-9.48±0.71)mmol/L;术后3小时:(-3.54±0.22)mmol/Lvs(-5.34±0.68)mmol/L],两组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。限制液体复苏组输液量、死亡率比较积极液体复苏组差异具有统计学意义[(1075±259)mlvs(2568±360)ml;(14.5%vs35.4%),P均<0.05)]。结论在出血未控制的情况下,早期限制性液体复苏在减少输液量的同时可维持重要脏器的血流灌注,减轻酸中毒,为后续救治创造条件,降低病死率。 Objective for improving the cure rate of patients with multiple injure and traumatic hemorrhagic shock,this study tried to evaluate the therapeutic effects of limiting fluid resuscitation(LFR).Methods the fifty patients with multiple injure and traumatic hemorrhagic shock were randomly divided into two groups which included the limiting fluid resuscitation(LFR) group and the aggressive fluid resuscitation(AFR) group,after treatment,serum lactate level,base excess(BE) in blood and inputting fluid of blood were compared between the two groups.Results There were significant differences in serum lactate and base excess(BE)between the two groups(P 0.05).The serum lactate of pre-surgery was(3.26±0.52) mmol/L vs(5.71±0.58) mmol/L respectively while 3hours later after operation reduced to(2.35±0.36) mmol/L vs(3.87±0.24) mmol/L.The base excess(BE) of pre-surgery was(-5.56±0.49) mmol/L vs(-9.48±0.71) mmol/L,compared to(-3.54±0.22) mmol/L vs(-5.34±0.68) mmol/L three hours later after operation.Meanwhile,the inputting fluid [(1075±259)ml vs(2568±360)ml P 0.05] and mortality.[(14.5% vs35.4 %,P 0.05)]were diffrent beween the LFR group and AFR group.Conclusion If hemorrhage is not controlled,limited fluid resuscitation can maintain blood perfusion of vital organs,alleviate acidosis,reduce mortality and creat good conditions for advanced teatment.
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2010年第6期713-715,共3页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
基金 温州市科技局课题(Y20060167)
关键词 创伤 失血性休克 限制性液体复苏 Trauma Hemorrhagic shock Limiting fluid resuscitation(LFR).
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1中华医学会呼吸病学分会.急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征的诊断标准(草案)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2000,23(4):203-203.
  • 2杨宗城.创伤性休克[A].见:黎鳌主编.现代创伤学[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.203-205.
  • 3金春华 见:赵克森 金丽娟主编.休克的基础研究[A].见:赵克森,金丽娟主编.休克的细胞和分子基础[C].北京:科学出版社,2002.308.
  • 4Scuhyfa MR,Terrg PC,Elliot CG,et al.The adult respiratory distress syndorme:a report of survival and modifying factors[J].Chest,1992,101:1074—1079.
  • 5赵超英 杨成民 李家增 季阳.休克的病理生理及防治[A].杨成民,李家增,季阳.基础输血学[C].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2001.521.
  • 6Capone AC, Safar P, Stezoski W, et al. Improved outcome with fluid restriction in treatment ofuncontrolled hemorrhagic shock [ J ]. J Am Coil Surg, 1995, 180 ( 1 ) : 49-56.
  • 7Soinmonov E, Hirsh M, Yahiya A, et al. The effect of vigorous fluid resuscitation in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after massive splenic injury [J]. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28 (5): 749-754.
  • 8Moomey CB, Melton SM, Croce MA, et al. Prognostic value of blood lactate, base deficit, and oxygen-derived variables in I2)50 model of penetrating trauma [J]. Crit Care Med, 1999, 27(1): 154.
  • 9Yamazaki Y, Saho A, Hascgawa K, et al. Blood lactate concentrations as predictors of outcome in serious hemorrhagic shock patients [ J ]. Masui, 2006, 55 (6): 699-703.
  • 10Burris D, Rhee P, Kaufman C, et al. Conffolled resuscitation for uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock [ J ]. J Trauma, 1999, 46 ( 2 ) : 216-223.

共引文献325

同被引文献81

引证文献7

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部