期刊文献+

早期与晚期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎有效性和安全性的评价 被引量:9

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价早期与晚期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、中文科技期刊数据库,均从建库检索至2010年1月,并筛选已获文献的参考文献,纳入早期与晚期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机对照试验。由2名研究者独立进行质量评价和数据提取,采用RevMan5.0.2软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入5个随机对照试验,合计425例患者。Meta分析结果显示,两组间的并发症(RR=0.92,95%CI:0.44-1.92;P=0.83)和中转开腹率(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.60-1.50;P=0.82)差异无统计学意义。总住院时间早期组短于晚期组(MD=-3.35,95%CI:-4.03--2.67;P<0.01),差异有统计学意义。结论:早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎安全有效,可缩短住院时间。 Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.Methods:The data was searched in PubMed,EMbase,Cochrane,Chinese BioMedicine database and Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database from established to Jan.2010,the references of the searched articles were screened for the randomized controlled trials of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Two independent investigators applied quality evaluation and data extraction.RevMan 5.0.2 was used for statistical analysis.Results:Five trials with 425 patients were included.According to the Meta analysis result,there was not significant difference between the two groups in complication (RR=0.92,95% CI:0.44-1.92;P=0.83) or the rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy (RR=0.95,95% CI:0.60-1.50;P=0.82).However,the total hospital stay was 3 days shorter in the early group than delayed group (MD=-3.35,95% CI:-4.03--2.67;P0.01).Conclusions:Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis appears safe and feasible,can shorten the hospital stay.
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2010年第12期894-898,共5页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 胆囊炎 急性 META分析 Cholecystectomy laparoscopic Cholecystitis acute Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Lawrentschuk N,Hewitt PM,Pritchard MG.Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy:implications of prolonged waiting times for surgery[J].ANZ J Surg,2003,73(11):890-893.
  • 2Kum CK,Eypasch E,Lefering R,et al.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis:is it really safe?[J].World J Surg,1996,20(1):43-48.
  • 3Yamashita Y,Takada T,Hirata K.A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of patients with acute cholecystitis in Japanese hospitals[J].J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg,2006,13(5):409-415.
  • 4Koo KP,Thirlby RC.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.What is the optimal timing for operation?[J].Arch Surg,1996,131(5):540-544.
  • 5Casillas RA,Yegiyants S,Collins JC.Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred management of acute cholecystitis[J].Arch Surg,2008,143(6):533-537.
  • 6Kum CK,Goh PM,Isaac JR,et al.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis[J].Br J Surg,1994,81(11):1651-1654.
  • 7Asoglu O,Ozmen V,Karanlik H,et al.Does the complication rate increase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis?[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2004,14(2):81-86.
  • 8Kolla SB,Aggarwal S,Kumar A,et al.Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis:a prospective randomized trial[J].Surg Endosc,2004,18(9):1323-1327.
  • 9Chandler CF,Lane JS,Ferguson P,et al.Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis[J].Am J Surg,2000,66(9):896-900.
  • 10Lai PB,Kwong KH,Leung KL,et al.Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis[J].Br J Surg,1998,85(6):764-767.

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部