浅议相对刑事责任年龄人转化型抢劫致人轻伤的处理

Discussion on Minor Wound Made by Transformation Robbery of Person at the Relative Legal Responsibility Age

相对刑事责任年龄人转化型抢劫致人轻伤该如何处理,《最高人民法院关于审理未成年人刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称《解释》)没有作出明确规定,学者有不应当定罪和应当定抢劫罪两种观点,而这两种观点的背后则是立法权和司法权的矛盾与协调问题。在中国现有国情下,当立法权和司法权发生冲突时,尊重立法权是一个较为合适的选择。

How to deal minor wound made by transformation robbery of person at the relative legal responsibility age,Supreme People＇s Court Explanation about Certain problems of Concrete Law Application on Tries of Minor Criminal Case（hereafter refers to as explaination） has not made stipulated explicitly,the scholar has two viewpoints,guilty of robbery and not guilty,however,behind these two viewpoints,there is contradiction and the coordination problem of the legislative power and the jurisdiction.Under the Chinese existing national condition,when the legislative power has conflict with the jurisdiction,to respect legislative power is a more appropriate choice.