关于受贿罪自首认定中隐瞒“行贿事实”问题的思考

On Concealing the "Bribe Fact" Issue in Surrender Recognization of the Bribery Crime

贿赂犯罪存在行贿与受贿的对向性,因此司法机关对受贿犯罪自首的认定上比较混乱。这种混乱出现的原因在于法律对自首本身规定的复杂性,以及检察机关与法院对自首标准的把握尺度不同,主要表现在:是否要求受贿罪自首时供述行贿事实。因此,应当通过合理的刑法解释,打破行贿人与受贿人之间"相互信任"的关系〔1〕,并给予受贿人一定的司法奖励,使受贿人能主动交代行贿犯罪事实,从而寻找到案件的突破口。

The bribe crime is the correspondence offense of the bribery,therefore it is quite chaotic for the judicial organ to recognize surrender in bribe crime.The reason for the confusion lies in the complexity of surrender stipulation in law,as well as that the procuratorial agency has different standard with the court on surrender,mainly displays in： whether request the bribery surrenders declare in a confession bribe fact.Therefore,the ＂trusts mutually＂relations between the correspondence offenses must be broken through the reasonable criminal law,and gives the bribe person certain judicature reward,causes the bribed to confess on his own delinquent bribes initiatively,thus seeks a breach for the case.