期刊文献+

国际贸易组织对社会规章影响模型——基于欧美农业多功能性视角

Theoretical Model That International Trade Institutions Impact on Social Regulations——Example of Agricultural Multifunctionality of USA and EU
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章发展了一个国际贸易组织对国内规章影响的动态模型,并用以验证欧盟和美国的农业多功能性政策,得出如下结论:虽然国际贸易组织可以促成"虚假"规章的无效,但其也可能促使居民放松国内限制来间接增加规章。如果总效应是增加的,则导致规章下降,长期中可以通过降低规章保护来弱化利益集团,缓和负外部性。这种正强化对前次选择"酌情"规则的国家有利,比如欧盟;如果总效应导致规章增加,长期中则表明强化利益集团,加大负外部性。这种负强化对应前次选择"限制"规则的国家,比如美国。 This article develops a model of domestic regulation under international trade institutions,and uses it to verify the Agricultutural multifunctionality of USA and EU,then draws a conclusion:international trade institution can invalidate spurious regulation,but it may also increase regulation by inducing citizens to dismantle domestic institutional constraints on it. If the total effect is a reduction in regulation,international trade institutions will weaken special interests and mitigate negative externality in the long run. This positive reinforcement benefits societies such as EU that has previously chosen discretion rule. But if the total effect is an expansion of regulation,international trade institutions could increase regulatory protection,strengthen special interests and reinforce negative exernality. This negative reinforcement is correspondent to societies such as USA that has previously chosen constraining rule.
作者 王力 姜发根
机构地区 安徽三联学院
出处 《兰州商学院学报》 CSSCI 2010年第6期29-35,共7页 Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College
关键词 国际贸易组织 规章 酌情规则 限制规则 international trade institution regulation discretion rule constraining rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kono,Daniel Y.Optimal Obfuscation:Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency[J/OL].American Political Science Review 2006,100 (3):369 -384.www.international.ucla.edu/cms/files/kono.pdf.
  • 2Special Eurobarometer.Europeans,Agriculture and the Common Agricultural Policy[R/OL].[2008-9-15].http://www.gesis.org/dienstleistungen/daten/umfragedaten/eurobarometer-data-service.
  • 3Maggi,Giovanni,and Andr' es Rodriguez-Clare.The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures[J/OL].Journal of Political Economy 1998,106 (3):574 - 601.linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304387810000623.
  • 4Grossman,Gene M.,and Elhanan Helpman.Special Interest Politics[R/OL].Cambridge.MIT Press2001.www.princeton.edu/- grossman/BaronJELReview.pdf.
  • 5杜传忠.新规制经济学规制俘获理论的借鉴价值[N].光明日报,2007-08-15.
  • 6谢识予.经济博弈论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006.
  • 7鲍尔斯.微观经济学:行为,制度和演化[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.156-234.
  • 8Kono, Daniel Y : "Optimal Obfuscation : Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency", American Political Science Review (2006) ,100 (3) : 369 -384.
  • 9欧盟2008年3月欧洲晴雨表,“欧洲,农业和共同农业政策”.
  • 10Maggi, Giovanni, and Andr' es Rodriguez - Clare. "The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures. " Journal of Political Economy (2009) 106 (3).

共引文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部