期刊文献+

三种麻醉深度监测方法评价小儿腹部手术镇静效果 被引量:2

THREE METHODS TO EVALUATE THE DEPTH OF ANESTHESIA FOR CHILDREN UNDERGOING ABDOMINAL OPERATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨脑电双频指数(BIS)、听觉诱发电位指数(AEPI)及病人状态指数(PSI)在监测小儿腹部手术镇静效果的差异,以选取最佳监测方案。方法 75例患儿分为三组(各组n=25),均使用腰麻+硬膜外联合麻醉,术中辅助咪唑安定维持患儿睡眠,分别使用BIS、AEPI及PSI监测麻醉深度;比较三组在入室(T1)、切皮前60 s(T2)、切皮即刻(T3)、切皮后60 s(T4)及切皮后120 s(T5)进行监测评分;比较改良后OAA/S同一评分下的BIS、AEPI及PSI指数差异,并进行相关性分析。结果 术中三组均无出现切皮体动,但患儿T2~T5四个时间点的BIS、AEPI及PSI指数的组间差异有显著性,且均以PSI最低(p<0.05);OAA/S=0~3分所对应的BIS、AEPI及PSI指数有组间差异(p<0.05),仍均以PSI最低;相关性分析表明上述3个指数与OAA/S评分呈正相关性,且以PSI与OAA/S的相关性最强(r=0.793,p=0.016)。结论 PSI受切皮的影响相对最小,且灵敏度、区分度较好,是监测小儿腹部全麻手术镇静效果较为理想的指标。 Objective To compare the difference between bispectral index(BIS),auditory evoked potential index(AEPI) and patient state index(PSI) to evaluate the depth of anesthesia for children who needed general anesthesia for abdominal operation.Methods 75 included children were divided into group BIS,AEPI and PSI(all n=25),and the lumbar combined epidural anesthesia were given to all the children.The indexes of BIS,AEPI and PSI were recorded at the time point of room entry(T1),60s before skin incision(SI)(T2),instant of SI(T3),60s after SI(T4) and 120s after SI(T5) were recorded and compared.The difference between BIS,AEPI and PSI at the same level of OAA/S score was also compared and the relation was analyzed.Results ①There were no case appearing body movement when accepting SI,but the difference between the BIS,AEPI and PSI at the time from T2 to T5 and the lowest indexes were all found in group PSI(p0.05).②The lowest indexes were also found in group PSI when OAA/S=0,1,2 and 3(p0.05).③Pearson analysis indicated that there were the positive relation between OAA/S and BIS,AEPI and PSI,and the most apparent relation was found between OAA/S and PSI(r=0.793 and p=0.016).Conclusion Compared with BIS and AEPI,PSI may be the best index to evaluate the depth of anesthesia for children who needed general anesthesia for abdominal operation for its less influence by skin incision and high sensitivity to discrimination to reflect the level of electrical activity.
作者 黎邝
机构地区 茂名农垦医院
出处 《现代医院》 2010年第12期31-33,共3页 Modern Hospitals
关键词 麻醉深度 小儿 腹部手术 指数 相关性分析 Depth of anesthesia Children Abdominal operation Indexes Correlation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献18

  • 1余海,刘斌.脑电非线性动力学分析在麻醉深度监测中的应用现状及前景[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(5):395-396. 被引量:7
  • 2徐光红,张健.吸入不同浓度的七氟醚对罗库溴铵肌松效应的影响[J].安徽医科大学学报,2007,42(1):104-105. 被引量:22
  • 3宋小星,陶国荣,彭章龙,于布为.熵指数监测麻醉镇痛的有效性[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(4):436-439. 被引量:13
  • 4毕素萍,张宏,贾宝森.熵指数监测在静吸复合全麻恢复期中的应用研究[J].解放军医学杂志,2007,32(6):629-631. 被引量:8
  • 5Perichep LS, John ER, Gugino LD, et al. Quantitative EEG assessment of changes in the level of sedation/hypnosis during surgery under general anesthesia: I. The Patient State Index (PSI). Ⅱ. Variable resolution electromagnetic tomography (VARETA). In: Jordan C, Vaughan DJA,Newton DEF, eds. Menory and awareness in anaesthesia Ⅳ: proceedings of the fourth international symposium. London: Imperial College Press,2000.97-107.
  • 6Drover DR, Lemmens HJ, Pierce ET, et al. Patient State Index: titration of delivery and recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 2002, 97: 82-89.
  • 7Dion P. The cost of anesthetic vapours. Can J Anaesth, 1992, 39:633.
  • 8Gugino LD, Chabot RJ, Prichep LS, et al. Quantitative EEG changes associated with loss and return of consciousness in healthy adult volunteers anesthetized with propofol or sevoflurane. Br J Anaesth, 2001, 87:421-428.
  • 9John ER, Prichep LS, Fridman J, et al. Neorometrics: computer-assisted differential diagnosis of brain dysfunctions. Science, 1988, 239: 162-169.
  • 10Chabot R J, Guogino LD, Aglio LS, et al. QEEG and neuropsychological profiles of patients after undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgical procedures. Clin Electroencephalogr, 1997, 28:98-105.

共引文献24

同被引文献41

  • 1周仁龙,杭燕南.麻醉镇静深度监测技术的评价和进展[J].中国医学装备,2005,2(1):22-26. 被引量:10
  • 2陈晓光,马虹,王俊科.病人状态指数指导腹腔镜手术病人地氟醚吸入麻醉的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(5):397-398. 被引量:4
  • 3Krkic M,Robert SJ,Rezek L. EEG-based assessment of anaesthetic depth using neural net works[J].Artifical Intelligence Methods for Biomedical Bata Processing IEE Colloquinmon,1996.10/1-10/6.
  • 4Elkfafi M,Shieh JS,Linkens DA. Intelligent signal processing of evoked patentitals for anaesthesia monitoring and control. Control Theory and Applications[J].IEEE Proceedings,1997.354-360.
  • 5Valdes P,Valdes M,Carballo JA. QEEG in a public health system[J].Brain Topography,1992.259-266.
  • 6John ER,Prichep LS,Kox W. Invariant reversible QEEG effects of anesthetics[J].Consciousness and Cognition,2001.165-183.
  • 7Disman N,Tuo P,Astutom AJ. Depth of sedation using Cerebral State Index in infants undergoing spinal anesthesia[J].Pediatric Anesthesia,2009.133-137.
  • 8Perichep LS,John ER,Gugino LD. Quantitative EEG assessment of changes in the level of sedation/hypnosis during surgery under general anesthesia:Ⅰ. The Patient State Index(PSI). Ⅱ. Variable resolution electromagnetic tomography(VARETA)[A].London:Imperial College Press,2000.97-107.
  • 9Gugino LD,Chabot RJ,Prichep LS. Quantitative EEG changes associated with loss and return of consciousness in healthy adult volunteers anaesthetized with propofol or sevoflurane[J].British Journal of Anaesthesia,2001.421-428.
  • 10Schnider TW,Minto CF,Shafer SL. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics[J].Anesthesiology,1999.1502-1516.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部