期刊文献+

销售侵权复制品罪司法认定困惑之分析 被引量:4

Puzzles in Determining Crimes of Selling Infringed Reproductions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 销售侵权复制品行为,特别是销售侵权音像制品行为,在司法实践中定罪量刑各异。对知识产权的有效保护,刑法并非唯一救济手段,也不应该成为唯一救济手段。销售侵权复制品罪主要侵害的客体是著作权人的著作权,在立法和司法中,都要围绕有利于保护著作权人的合法权益进行规制。销售侵权复制品罪与非法经营罪既不存在法条竞合,也不存在想象竞合。 In judicial practice,convictions and punishments of selling infringed reproductions(especially infringed music and video reproductions)are varied.For effective protection of intellectual property,criminal law is not and shall not be the only redress.The object of the crime of selling infringed reproductions is the infringement of the copyright owner;the regulation of it in both legislation and judicial practice shall be centered on the protection of copyright owner's legitimate right and interest.The relation between the crime of selling infringed reproduction and the crime of illegal business is not overlap of law provisions,neither overlap of envision.
作者 邵小平
机构地区 上海商学院
出处 《上海商学院学报》 2010年第6期50-53,共4页 Business Economic Review
关键词 销售侵权复制品罪 非法经营罪 刑法介入 客体 竞合 crime of selling infringed reproductions crime of illegal business criminal law intervention object overlap
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献12

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部