Predicting IJVs＇ effectiveness based on their autonomy levels and the characteristics of their parent companies
Predicting IJVs＇ effectiveness based on their autonomy levels and the characteristics of their parent companies
摘要
Separate research streams have identified relationships between IJV autonomy and IJV effectiveness, and between functional/dysfunctional parent-company differentiation and IJV effectiveness. This study attempts to integrate these two literature streams by examining how these two sets of independent variables interact in terms of predicting IJV effectiveness. Results partially support our hypotheses that the autonomy-effectiveness relationship is less positive with greater functional differentiation and more positive with greater dysfunctional differentiation. The results provide strong support for our hypotheses that activities closer to the local operating environment will influence these relationships such that autonomy becomes more important to effectiveness when an activity has strong local ties.
参考文献81
-
1Barden, J. Q., Steensma, H. K. & Lyles, M. A.. (2005). The influence of parent control structure on parent conflict in Vietnamese international joint ventures: An organizational justice-based contingency approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 156-174.
-
2Barney, J. B.. (1991). Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
-
3Barr, P. S. & Glynn, M. A.. (2004). Cultural variations in strategic issue interpretation: Relating cultural uncertainty avoidance to controllability in discriminating threat and opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 59-67.
-
4Bartlett, C. A.. (1986). Building and managing the transnational: The new organizational challenge. In: Porter, M. (Ed.), Competition in Global Industries. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 367-401.
-
5Beamish, P. S. & Jung, J. C.. (2005). The performance and survival of joint ventures with parents of asymmetric size. Management International, 10(1), 19-30.
-
6Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. & Young, S.. (2005). Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14, 227-248.
-
7Bjorkman, I., Smale, A., Sumelius, J., Suutari, V. & Lu, Y.. (2008). Changes in institutional context and MNC operations in China: Subsidiary HRM practices in 1996 versus 2006. International Business Review, 17, 146-158.
-
8Bleeke, J. &Emst, D.. (1993). Collaborate to compete. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
-
9Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna, P., Puumalainen, K. & Saarenketo, S.. (2005). Striving towards R&D collaboration performance: The effect of asymmetry, trust and contracting. Creativity andlnnovation Management, 14(4), 374-383.
-
10Brannen, M. Y. & Peterson, M. F.. (2009). Merging without alienating: Interventions promoting cross-cultural organizational integration and their limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 468-489.
-
1范旭阳.组织规模与“大政党病”[J].领导文萃,2013(20):109-112. 被引量：1
-
2秦庆红,李忠祥.浅谈加强成本管理与控制在施工企业管理中的必要性[J].山东工业技术,2016(16):298-298. 被引量：2
-
3张敬淦.北京城市经营与城市规划[J].北京规划建设,2002(5):30-33. 被引量：1
-
4邓洁煌.生态规划中城市边缘区的环境景观设计[J].现代装饰（理论）,2013,0(12):74-74. 被引量：1
-
5徐涵.惠普蒙羞Autonomy财务欺诈相关人士相互推诿难定责任人[J].IT时代周刊,2012(23):28-29.
-
6张宝义.市场机制:改善我国民生问题的重要途径[J].城市,2013(5):37-40.
-
7陈云卿.提高企业经营效果[J].管理观察,1994,0(6):19-20.
-
8黄建东.有效决策的七要素[J].中外管理,2006(3):56-57. 被引量：3
-
9齐国生.论经济性、效率性、效果性 在绩效审计评价中的辩证关系[J].中国审计,2002(10):23-25. 被引量：12
-
10山石.我们也是暖通空调人[J].机电信息,2009(22):27-28.
