摘要
目的:观察后牙区Replace种植体埋入式愈合与非埋入式愈合的临床疗效。方法:本实验采取区段随机化分组方法,将40例患者(95颗种植)随机分为A组(埋入式愈合)和B组(非埋入式愈合),比较种植体负重后1年种植体周骨组织水平变化、牙菌斑、软组织炎症情况以及种植体存留率。采用SPSS16.0软件包对骨组织水平变化进行独立样本t检验,其余参数采用独立样本非参数检验。结果:2组种植体存留率均为100%,种植体周骨组织水平变化A组和B组分别为(0.16±0.46mm)和(0.04±0.35mm),P>0.05,无显著性差异;2组间种植体周牙菌斑聚集及软组织炎症情况也无显著性差异。结论:Replace种植系统非埋入式愈合可取得良好的种植体周软、硬组织以及骨整合,疗效良好。非埋入式可以替代埋入式愈合,作为Replace种植体植入的常规方案。
PURPOSE:To observe the clinical effect of implant healing between submerged and non-submerged dental implant in posterior lower jaw.METHODS:Totally 40 cases(95 implants,Nobel Replace System) were randomly divided into Group A(submerged healing) and Group B(non-submerged healing).The peri-implant bone level,soft tissue inflammation,implant plaque aggregation,and implant retention were evaluated one year after implant loading.The change of bone level was calculated by independent t test while the others were calculated by independent non-parameter test using SPSS16.0 software package.RESULTS:The implant retention rate was 100% in both groups;the peri-implant bone levels in group A and group B were(0.16±0.46mm) and(0.04±0.35mm),respectively.There was no significant difference between both groups in implant bone level,peri-implant tissue inflammation and implant plaque aggregation.CONCLUSIONS:Replace non-submerged implant healing merits good implant healing of soft and hard tissue and bone integration,with good clinical efficacy;non-submerged implant healing can be used as an alternative to submerged implant healing.
出处
《上海口腔医学》
CAS
CSCD
2010年第6期594-597,共4页
Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词
埋入式愈合
非埋入式愈合
随机对照试验
口腔种植
Submerged healing
Non-submerged healing
Randomized controlled trial
Dental implant