期刊文献+

多通道阻抗联合24 h食管pH监测在胃食管反流病中的应用 被引量:5

Application of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨多通道阻抗联合24 h pH监测在胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD),尤其在pH(-)GERD患者中的应用价值。方法 48例GERD患者应用多通道阻抗联合24 h pH监测,根据Demeester评分分为pH(-)与pH(+),其中pH(-)GERD 30例,pH(+)GERD 18例;另相同监测健康大学生志愿者20例做正常对照组。结果 GERD组酸反流次数、卧位食团暴露时间及总食团暴露时间均高于正常对照组,差别有统计学意义(P=0.01,P=0.002,P=0.03);GERD组非酸反流次数低于正常对照组,差别有统计学意义(P=0.002)。pH(-)GERD组卧位食团暴露时间高于正常对照组(P=0.015),pH(-)GERD酸反流次数及卧位食团暴露时间均低于pH(+)GERD,差别有统计学意义(P=0.02,P=0.04)。结论多通道阻抗联合24 h pH监测能发现更多的反流事件,在GERD尤其对pH(-)GERD患者的诊断有实用意义,需进一步研究。 Objective To investigate the application of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD),especially in pH (- )GERD patients.Methods Forty-eight patients underwent combined MII and 24 h pH monitoring, and patients were divided into pH(- ) GERD and pH(+ ) GERD group according to Demeester score. The normal values of 20 healthy volunteers who underwent MII and 24 h pH monitoring were served as controls.Results The acid reflux frequency,ambulatory alimentary bolus exposure time and total alimentary bolus exposure of GERD were relatively higher than those in control group respectively(P = 0.01,P =0.002,P =0.03),the non-acid reflux frequency in GERD group were relatively lower than those in control group(P =0.002).The ambulatory alimentary bolus exposure time of pH(- )GERD were relatively higher than that in normal group(P =0.015),the weak base reflux frequency of pH(- ) GERD were relatively lower than that in control group(P =0.022).The non-acid reflux frequency and ambulatory alimentary bolus exposure time of pH(- ) GERD were relatively higher than those in pH(+) GERD(P=0.02,P=0.04).Conclusion Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring is helpful in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease,especially in the pH(- ) GERD patients.
出处 《同济大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2010年第6期51-54,共4页 Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
基金 上海市科委临床重点资助项目(054119544)
关键词 多通道阻抗监测 PH 24 h监测 胃食管反流病 Demeester评分 multichannel intraluminal impedance 24 h esophageal pH monitoring gastroesophageal reflux disease Demeester scores
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1林三仁,许国铭,胡品津,周丽雅,陈旻湖,柯美云,袁耀宗,房殿春,萧树东.中国胃食管反流病共识意见[J].胃肠病学,2007,12(4):233-239. 被引量:528
  • 2Conchillo JM,Schwartz MP,Selimah M,et al.Acid and non-acid reflux patterns in patients with erosiveesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease(NERD):a study using intraluminal impedance monitoring[J].Dig Dis Sci,2008,53:1506-1512.
  • 3Hila A,Agrawal A,Castell DO.Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance testing eompared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux[J].Clin Gamoenterol Hetepatol,2007,5:172-177.
  • 4Csendes A,Braghetto I,Burdiles P,et al.Late results of esophagomyotomy for patients with achalasia[J].Ann Surg,2006,243(2):196-203.
  • 5汤欣,张玫,孙书春.胃食管反流病的食管动力障碍研究[J].实用医学杂志,2009,25(3):402-404. 被引量:11
  • 6Bredenoordl AJ,Weustenl BL,Smout AJ.Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring[J].GUT,2005,54:1810-1817.
  • 7Long JD,Orlando RC.Nonerosive reflux disease:a patholgaysiologic perspective[J].Ctment Gastroenterology Reports,2008,10:200-207.
  • 8Sharma N,Agrawal A,Freeman J,et al.An analysis of persistent symptoms in acid patients undergoing impedance-pH monitoring[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2008,6(5):521-524.

二级参考文献68

共引文献536

同被引文献62

  • 1高萍,许国铭,邹多武.50名正常中国成人食管24小时pH监测结果分析[J].中华消化杂志,1996,16(1):32-34. 被引量:103
  • 2何慕芝,蔡闯,彭华,江亚文,邹霞英.老年人食管反流性咽炎所致慢性咳嗽32例临床分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(10):756-757. 被引量:2
  • 3林三仁,许国铭,胡品津,周丽雅,陈旻湖,柯美云,袁耀宗,房殿春,萧树东.中国胃食管反流病共识意见(2006·10三亚)[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(2):170-173. 被引量:183
  • 4Zerbib F, des Varannes SB, Roman S, et al. Normalvalues and day-to-day variability of 24-h ambulatoryoesophageal impedance-pH monitoring in a Belgian-French cohort of healthy subjects [ J ]. AlimentPharmacol Ther, 2005,22( 10) ; 1011—1021.
  • 5Weber C, Davis CS, Fisichella PM. Currentapplications of evolving methodologies in gastroeso-phageal reflux disease testing [ J ]. Dig Liver Dis,2011,43(5) : 353 -357.
  • 6Hila A, Agrawal A, Castell DO. Combined multicha-nnel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testingcompared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid andweakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux [ J ]. ClinGastroenterol Hepatol,2007,5 : 172 - 177.
  • 7Zerbib F,Roman S,Ropert A, et al. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD :a study in patients off and on therapy [ J ]. Am JGastroenterol, 2006,101: 1956-1963.
  • 8Fock KM, Poh CH. Gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2010,45(8) : 808—815.
  • 9Frootan M, Choobtashani S, Azargashb E,et al. Non-erosive reflux disease compared with erosive esophagitiswith regards to acid reflux and symptom patterns [ J ].Turk J Gastroenterol,2011,22(5) : 464 -471.
  • 10Karoui S,Ben Temime H,Serghini M, et al. 24-houresophageal impedance-ph monitoring : technical aspec-ts, indications and results [ J]. Tunis Med, 2012,90(5): 351 -356.

引证文献5

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部