链霉溶液保留灌肠与康复新液保留灌肠治疗直肠炎疗效对比

采用我科自制链霉溶液保留灌肠治疗直肠炎，观察其临床治疗效果，将诊断明确的直肠炎患者96例分为两组，治疗组54例采用自制链霉溶液保留灌肠，对照组42例采用康复新液保留灌肠。治疗组治愈45例，显效6例，有效3例，平均治疗时间（7．6±2．7）天；对照组治愈26例，显效6例，有效5例，无效5例，治疗时间（13．6±2．8）天。两组治愈率、平均治疗时间均有统计学意义（P〈0．05，P〈0．01）。结果表明：链霉溶液保留灌肠治疗直肠炎疗效较好。

The aim is to observe the clinical effects of treating proctitis, using chain mildew solution retention enema made by the Departmenl of Anorectal Surgery in our hospital. The 96 patients who are diagnosed with proctitis were divided into two groups： the treatment group--54 patients and were treated with the ehain mildew solution retention enema, and the control group-42 patients and were treated with rehabilitation new liquid. In the treatment group, 45 of them were cured, 6 of them showed apparent effects, and 3 of them showed effects, and the average time of treatment was （7.6 ± 2.7） days. In the control group, 26 of them were cured, 6 of them showed apparent effects, 5 of them showed effects, and 5 of them showed no effects, and the average time was （13.6 ± 2.8） days. The cure rate and the average treatment time in both groups have statistical significance （P 〈 0.05, P 〈 0.01）. The results indicate that chain mildew solution retention enema has better effects in treating proctitis.