摘要
我国《票据法》(修正)在票据失权方面存在诸多立法失误。票据权利丧失,即票据失权,包括票据权利绝对丧失和票据权利相对丧失。它在诸多方面有别于票据权利消灭,不可混同使用。票据权利人会因多种情形而丧失票据权利,国内票据立法为失权人权益救济提供了多种保护途径,但比较各国票据失权相关立法,在失权人合法权益保护等方面,我国票据失权立法仍有待完善和改进。
Law of the People's Republic of China on Negotiable Instruments(Revised) has many flaws in terms of legislation on irritancy of rights of negotiable instrument.Loss of rights of negotiable instrument,namely the irritancy of rights of negotiable instrument,includes absolutely loss and relatively loss of rights of negotiable instrument,and differs from the extinguishment of rights of negotiable instrument in many ways.Such distinction must be made between these two concepts.The holder may loss his rights of negotiable instrument under various circumstances.Our domestic legislation on negotiable instruments has provided certain means to protect the right loser's interests in the negotiable instruments.Compared with other jurisdictions,China's legislation on irritancy of rights of negotiable instrument is still in dire need of improvement regarding the protection of the right loser's interests.
出处
《上海金融》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第1期89-93,共5页
Shanghai Finance
基金
上海市重点学科建设项目(项目编号:B102)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
票据失权
票据权利
副本票据
参加付款
Irritancy of Rights of Negotiable Instrument
Rights of Negotiable Instrument
Copy of Negotiable Instrument
Payment by Intervention