期刊文献+

21例泛耐药鲍氏不动杆菌肺炎治疗分析 被引量:14

Therapeutic analysis of pan-drug resistant acinetobacter baumannii causing pneumonia in 21 patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨较大剂量头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗泛耐药鲍氏不动杆菌肺炎的临床疗效,为临床合理应用抗菌药物提供指导。方法对2009年5月-2010年7月21例使用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗泛耐药鲍氏不动杆菌肺炎的危重症患者进行回顾分析,对头孢哌酮/舒巴坦的临床疗效进行观察。结果 21例患者经治疗后,其中7例治愈,6例改善,8例失败,总有效率61.9%;8例患者细菌得到有效清除,细菌清除率为38.1%,3例患者死亡。结论较大剂量头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗泛耐药鲍氏不动杆菌肺炎,取得较满意疗效;细菌清除率低,与临床疗效相关性差,考虑与细菌定植有关。 OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical therapeutic effect of mid-large dose cefoperazone/sulbactam to pan-drug resistant(PDR) Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia and provide experience for proper choice of antibiotics in clinic.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted to define the patients who received cefoperazone/sulbactam for PDR A.baumannii pneumonias between May,2009 and July,2010.A total of 21 severe patients were eligible for the study.The clinical therapeutic effect of cefoperazone/sulbactam was observed.RESULTS Thirteen out of 21 patients had successful clinical outcomes,cure in 7 patients and improvement in 6.The total effective rate was 61.9%.Eight of 21 patients had microbiological success,the microbiological clearance rate was 38.1%.Three of 21 patients died.CONCLUSIONS The clinical therapeutic effect of mid-large dose cefoperazone/sulbactam to PDR A.baumannii pneumonia is encouraging.The microbiological clearance rate is poor.Correlation between microbiological response and clinical outcome is poor and related to the microbiological colorizations.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期264-266,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 泛耐药鲍氏不动杆菌 肺炎 头孢哌酮/舒巴坦 临床疗效 Pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia Cefoperazone/sulbactam Clinical therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Wilcox Mark, Nathwani Dilip, Dryden Matthew. Linezolid compared with teicoplanin for the treatment of suspected or proven Gram-positive infections[J]. The Journal of Antimicrolbial Chemotheropy, 2004,53 ( 2 ) : 335 -344.
  • 2Moise Pamela A, Forrest Alan, Birmingham Mary C, et al. The efficacy and safety of linezolid as treatment for Staphylo coccus aureus infections in compassionate use patients who are intolerant of, or who have failed to respond to, vancomycin [J]. the iournal of antimicrolbial chemotheropy, 2002,50 (6):1017-1026.
  • 3Romanelli RM, Jesus LA, Clemente WT, et al. Outbreak of resistant Acinetobacter baurnannii-mcasures and proposal for prevention and control[J].Braz J Infect Dis, 2009, 13 (5) : 341-347.
  • 4Federico Perez, Andrea M Hujer, KristJne M Hujer, et al Global Challenge of Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter bau mannii[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2007,51(10) 3471- 3484.
  • 5Garnacho-Montero J, Amaya-Villar R. Multiresistant Acinetobacter baurnannii infections: epidemiology and management [J]. Curr Opin Infect Dis,2010,23(4):332- 339.
  • 6Mastoraki A, Douka E, Kriaras I, et al. Preventing strategy of multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumanii susceptible only to colistin in cardiac surgical intensive care units[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2008,33 (6) : 1086-1090.
  • 7Falagas M, Fragoulis K, Kasiakou S, et al. Nephrotoxicity of intravenous colistin:a prospective evaluation[J].Int J Antimicrob, 2005,26(6) :504-507.
  • 8Falagas M, Rizos M, Bliziotis I, et al. Toxicity after prolonged (more than four weeks) administration of intravenous colistin[J].Clinical Microbiology & Infection,2005,11(Supplement 2) :335-336.
  • 9Hernandcz-Torres A, Garcia-Vazquez E, Yague G, et al. Carbapenem and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii colonisarion/infection:Epidemiology and factors associated to infection[J]. Clinical Microbiology & Infection,2010,16 Sup 2:S369.
  • 10Metan G, Alp E, Yildiz O, et al. Clinical experience with tigecycline in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter infections[J].J Chemother,2010,22(2) :110-114.

同被引文献129

引证文献14

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部