摘要
近年来,一些学者主张我国应吸收借鉴西方国家的排除合理怀疑的证明标准,客观地讲,该证明标准在西方确实能最大限度地防控错判无辜的司法错误,同时还可以兼顾错放罪犯的司法错误,但却是以一套科学合理的证明机制为配套的。鉴于我国现实的制度语境,庭审证明标准能否松动不仅在于语词的改换,更在于语境的转换与配套证明机制之完善。
In recent years, some scholars claim that China should learn western judicial proving standard such as "beyond the reasonable doubt". Honestly speaking, it can prevent the error of wronging the innocent in a maximum and meanwhile give attention to the error of releasing the criminal. However, in transformation China, the proving standards in practice are very different. Therefore, whether the proving standards in China could change lies in not only the change of discourse but also the change of context and the improvement of relative systems.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第1期63-73,共11页
Law and Social Development
基金
上海市教委2010年晨光项目(A类)"转型社会的刑事司法错误"(2010CG13)
上海市哲学与社会科学2010年规划项目"世界经验与中国模式:反恐打黑的特殊诉讼机制"(2010EFX005)
关键词
证明理性化
定罪标准
司法错误
社会控制
rationality of proof
judicial proving standard
judicial error
social control