期刊文献+

海伦市资源演化格局与土地利用变化及其生态效应分析 被引量:13

Resource evolution pattern, land use change and related ecological effect in Hailun City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以黑龙江省海伦市为例,运用1980年、1995年和2000年的土地利用数据与实地调查相结合,对20年间海伦市土地利用演化过程进行了分析;利用生态服务价值理论与方法,分析了海伦市土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响程度。结果表明:1980~2000年间,海伦市的耕地、城镇用地、交通用地呈增加趋势,而林地、草地及湿地则呈减少趋势。区域生态效应(生态服务价值)随土地利用类型的变化而变化,耕地对生态效应的贡献率最高,为43.67%(2000年);其次是湿地和林地,分别为26.32%和14.96%(2000年);居民点及工矿用地对生态效应的贡献率为负值。1980~2000年间海伦市土地利用的生态服务功能在食物生产功能方面明显增强,而在气体调节、气候调节、废物处理、土壤形成、侵蚀控制、原材料利用和娱乐文化等方面有所下降,说明城市的快速发展和粮食生产能力的提高,在一定程度上导致了区域整体生态效应的下降。 Using Hailun City as a case study site, land use data were collected for 1980, 1995 and 2000, evolution process of land use was analyzed via GIS and field investigations. Theory and method of ecosystem service value was used to evaluate the ecological impact of land use change in the region. The results showed that while farm, urban and traffic land areas increased, those of forest, grassland and wetland decreased. Based on ecosystem service value, ecological effects varied with land use type. Contribution rates to the ecological effects were highest for farmland (43.67% in 2000), followed by wetland (26.32% in 2000) and then forestland (14.69% in 2000). Residential and industrial land had negative contribution rates. Whereas the ecological service functions of gas and climate regulation, waste disposal, soil formation, erosion control, raw material production, recreation and culture declined, those of food production increased from 1980 through 2000. This indicated rapid development of city and grain productivity in the region, on some extent, resulting in the decrease of ecological effect.
出处 《中国生态农业学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期211-216,共6页 Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(40671075) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BADB3B04) 中国科学院黑土生态重点实验室资助项目 黑龙江省科技厅计划项目(GB08D101-3)资助
关键词 农业资源 资源演化 土地利用 生态服务 生态效应 海伦市 Agricultural resources Resource evolution Land use Ecological service Ecological effect Hailun City
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献17

  • 1宋文质,王少彬,苏维瀚,曾江海,王智平,张玉铭.我国农田土壤的主要温室气体CO_2、CH_4和N_2O排放研究[J].环境科学,1996,17(1):85-88. 被引量:77
  • 2Lee K,Earthworms Their Ecology and Relationships with Soils and Land Use,1985年
  • 3Bjorklund J., Limburg K. E., Rydberg T. Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden. Ecol-Econ., 1999,29: 269~ 291
  • 4Corwin D. L.,Wagenet R.J. Application of GIS to the modeling of nonpoint source pollutions in the vadose zone: A conference overview. J. Environ. Qual., 1996,25 (3): 403 ~ 411
  • 5Ebbert J.C.,Kim M.H. Soil processes and chemical transport. J Environ. Qual.,1998,27:372~380
  • 6Pimentel D., Harvey C., Resosudarmo P., et al. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science, 1995,267:1117~1123
  • 7IPCC Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge, U. K: Cambridge University Press, 1996
  • 8Costanza R., d' Arge R., de Groot R., et al. The value of the world' s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997,387: 253 ~ 260
  • 9Lal R., Kimble J. M., Follet R. F., et al. The Potential of US Cropland to Sequestration Carbon and Mitigation to the Greenhouse Effect. Sleeping Bear Press, 1998.55~ 87
  • 10李文华.长江洪水与生态建设[J].中国农业资源与区划,1998,19(6):4-9. 被引量:32

共引文献3793

同被引文献167

引证文献13

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部