期刊文献+

旱作农田近地表风沙运动与防风蚀效果 被引量:6

Drought Farmland Near Surface Blown Sand and Wind Erosion Controlling Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对农田沙害,用移动式风蚀风洞及相关配套设备对莜麦留茬、砾石覆盖和传统旱作农田地表进行原位测试,研究它们的近地表风沙运动规律,探索莜麦留茬和砾石覆盖对旱作农田土壤风蚀的作用机理和防护效果,从而为农田风蚀防治提供技术依据。研究表明,莜麦留茬、砾石覆盖近地表风沙运动与对照秋翻地明显不同;受莜麦残茬和砾石覆盖的阻挡、疏散作用,风沙活动层提升,近地表风速不同程度削弱;输沙量小于对照秋翻地并且在近地表一定高度处出现极大值。抗风蚀效率分析证明,莜麦留茬和砾石覆盖对旱作农田防治风蚀都有重要的作用,但砾石覆盖不如莜麦留茬的防风蚀效果好。 Aiming at farmland wind erosion sand calamity,in situ testing was adopted to make test for oat stubble,grave covering and traditional drought farmland by using movable wind erosion tunnel and its matching equipment.In order to provide technical basis,blown sand movement law was researched for the three kinds of farmland,and the mechanism and protection effect of soil erosion were explored for the oat stubble and grave covering affecting drought farmland.It is showed that near surface blown sand movement of oat stubble and grave covering are obviously different from autumn-ploughed farmland,the blown sand movement layer was lifted,near surface wind speed was weakened at different degrees,sediment discharge is less than autumn-ploughed farmland's and would have maximum value in certain height,because of barrier and evacuation effects of oat stubble and grave covering.By anti-erosion efficiency analyzing,it is showed that oat stubble and grave covering have important effect on drought farmland for wind erosion controlling,and the effect of the latter is less than the former.
出处 《农业机械学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期54-58,共5页 Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40861013)
关键词 农田 风蚀 砾石 风沙流 风速廓线 Farmland Wind erosion Grave Drifting sand flux Velocity profile
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1陈智,麻硕士,赵永来,孙悦超,崔红梅.保护性耕作农田地表风沙流特性[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):118-122. 被引量:41
  • 2孙悦超,麻硕士,陈智,赵永来,冬梅.北方农牧交错区草原地表土壤风蚀原位测试技术[J].农业机械学报,2010,41(6):49-52. 被引量:9
  • 3孙悦超,麻硕士,陈智,赵永来.保护性耕作农田风沙流空间分布规律研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(4):180-184. 被引量:5
  • 4郝青振,邹学勇,董光荣,李长治,王国昌.室内沙风洞空洞条件下流场规律[J].中国沙漠,1998,18(4):334-339. 被引量:10
  • 5Wang X, Wanga T, Dong Z, et al. Nebkha development and its significance to wind erosion and land degradation in semi-arid northern China [ J ]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2006, 65 ( 1 ) : 129 - 141.
  • 6Maurer T, Hemnann L, Gaiser T, et al. A mobile wind tunnel for wind erosion field measurements [ J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2006, 66:257 - 271.
  • 7Borak S B, Jasinski M F, Crago R D. Time series vegetation aerodynamic roughness fields estimated from moths observations [ J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2005, 135 (1- 4) :252 -268.
  • 8Zhang Chunlai, Zou Xueyong, Gong Jirui, et al. Aerodynamic roughness of cultivated soil and its influences on soil erosion by wind in a wind tunnel [Jl. Soil & Tillage Research, 2004,75(1) :53 -59.
  • 9Daniel E Buschiazzo, Ted M Oobeck, Bascal S A. Wind erosion quantity and quality of an Entic Haplustoll of the semi-arid pampas of Argentina [ J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2007, 69( 1 ) :29 - 39.

二级参考文献62

共引文献56

同被引文献105

引证文献6

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部