期刊文献+

企业战略行动成败与行动进程安排之间的关系——合法性视角下的多案例研究 被引量:5

The Relationship between the Success or Failure of the Strategic Action and It's Process Arrangement:A Legitimacy Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从合法性的视角出发,基于对7个案例的分析,考察了企业战略行动成败与行动进程安排之间的关系。研究发现:①在初始合法性不完备,或者因政策变化导致战略行动面临合法性危机时,战略行动进程安排对战略行动成败有至关重要的影响;②战略行动的横向拆分和纵向拆分都有可能降低合法性要求,甚至改变合法性要求的性质,但是2种拆分方式应对合法性危机的效果是不同的;③对民营企业来说,为了应对合法性风险,应尽量选择横向拆分;④对国有企业来说,尽管横向拆分能够降低风险,但是却可能使项目萎缩,不能达到战略目标,而纵向拆分更有可能与政府利益进行捆绑,可以调动更多的力量支持自己的行为。 From a legitimacy perspective,this paper examines the relationship between the success or failure of a strategic action and it's process arrangement based on the analysis of seven cases.We find that:(i)if a strategic action is illegitimate at the beginning or becomes illegitimate with the policy changes during the process of the implementation of the strategy,the process arrangement influences the results of the strategy;(ii)both the horizontal disassembly and vertical disassembly improve legitimacy,or(and) change the type of legitimacy demand,but the effects are different;(iii)for the private firms,the horizontal disassembly may be more appropriate to reduce the risk;(iv)for the state-owned firms,the horizontal disassembly can reduce the legitimacy risk but it is entirely possible to reduce the size of the project,but the vertical disassembly may result in a tie-up of the firm with the government agency who is to support the strategic action.This paper also put forward some advices for management.
作者 李玉刚 张腾
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 2011年第2期195-205,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(09YJA630037)
关键词 战略行动成败 行动进程 合法性 横向拆分 纵向拆分 所有制类型 success or failure of strategic actions action processes legitimacy horizontal disassembly vertical disassembly ownership types
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1KERIN R A, VARADARAJAN P R, PETERSON R. First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis,Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions[J].Journal of Marketing, 1992,56(3): 33-52.
  • 2LIEBERMAN M B, MONTGOMERY D B. First- Mover (Dis) Advantages : Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998,19(12): 1 111-1 125.
  • 3DROEGE S, JOHNSON N B. Broken Rules and Constrained Confusion: Toward a Theory of Meso- Institutions[J]. Management and Organization Review,2007, 3(1) : 81-104.
  • 4STINCHCOMBE A L. Organizations and Social Structure[M]//MARCH J G. Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1965 : 140-200.
  • 5ALDRICH H E, FIOL C M. Fools Rush in: The Institutional Context of Industry Creation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(4): 645-670.
  • 6BAUM J A C, OLIVER C. Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, 36(2): 187-218.
  • 7OLIVER C. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991,16(1): 145-179.
  • 8ZIMMERMAN M A,ZEITZ G J. Beyond Survival: Achiveing New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(3) :414-431.
  • 9RUTHERFORD M W, BULLER P F. Searching for the Legitimacy Threshold[J].Journal of Management Inquiry, 2007, 16(1): 78-92.
  • 10MEYER J W, ROWAN B. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977,83 (2) : 340-363.

二级参考文献112

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部