期刊文献+

论意义组合原则中的若干问题 被引量:2

On the principle of compositionality of Meaning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 组合原则是逻辑语义学和自然语言形式语义学中的一条指导性原则,它在逻辑语义学和自然语言句法和语义接口研究中有广泛的应用,但同时这条原则所体现出的方法论性质又备受争议。该原则对逻辑和自然语言成立吗?这一问题不可能给出直接的回答,因为对这条原则的阐述其本身就十分的含糊。逻辑学家和语言学家可以根据自己的理解和表达来表述这条原则。事实表明,组合原则不是一种经验上可证实的限制性原则,而是一种描述系统中的句法和语义应当如何加以设计的方法论原则。 As a guiding principle for logical semantics and formal semantics of natural language,the principle of compositionality of meaning is widely applied;however,the nature of its underlying epistemology is highly controversial.Does this principle apply to logic and natural language? There is no definite answer to this question,for the ambiguity of the principle itself.And logicians and linguists have different understandings and interpretations of it.The fact indicates that the principle of compositionality of meaning is not a principle that can be demonstrated empirically,but one that describes how the syntax and semantics are designed in systems.
作者 朱建平
机构地区 苏州大学哲学系
出处 《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期48-53,124,共6页 Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Janssen, Partee. Edited by J van Benthem and A ter Meulen. Handbook of logic and language[M]. North Holland, 1997.
  • 2Manfred Krifka. Edited by Wilson and Keil. The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences [ M]. MIT press, 1999.
  • 3Montague R. Formal Philosophy[M]. Yale university press, 1973.
  • 4Cann Ronnie. Formal semantics [ M]. Cambridge, MA, 1993.
  • 5Dummett Frege. Philosophy of language [ M]. Duckworth, London, 2007.
  • 6Popper. Unended quest. An Intellectual Autobiography [M]. Fontann, 1976.
  • 7Katz. The philosophy of language[M]. Harper and row. london, 1996.
  • 8Katz Fodor. The Structure of a semantic theory [J ]. Language 39: 170-210.
  • 9Hintikka. Theories truth and leamable[J]. language, 1981.
  • 10Sehiffer. Remnants of meaning [ M ]. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1987.

同被引文献18

  • 1Bencini, Giulia M. L. & Adele E. Goldberg. The Contribution to Argument Structure Constructions to Sentence Meaning [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2000, (43) : 640 -651.
  • 2Croft, Willian. Radical Construction Grammar : Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective [ M ]. Oxford : Ox- ford University Press, 2001.
  • 3Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul, Michaelis, Laura A. & Ivan Sag. Construction Grammar [ M ]. Stanford, Ca- lif. : CSLI Publications, 2004.
  • 4Goldberg, Adele E. Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M ]. Chicago : Chicago University Press, 1995.
  • 5Goldberg, Adele E. Constructions : A new theoretical approach to language [ J ]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003, 7(5): 219-224.
  • 6Janssen, Partee. The Handbook of Logic and Language [ C ]. Edited by Benthem J. van and Meulen A. ter. North Holland, 1997.
  • 7Johnson, Mark. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason [ M ]. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 8Langacker, Ronald W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I : Theoretical Prerequisites [ M ]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 9Langacker, Ronald W. Viewing in Cognition and Grammar [ C ]// Davis, P. W. Alternative Linguistics : De-scriptive and Theoretical Modes. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1995.
  • 10Langacker, Ronald W. Cognitive Grammar, A Basic Introduction [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部