中国发展战略性新兴产业的政策选择——主流经济学和演化经济学的比较分析被引量：14

Policy Choices of Chinese Development of Strategic Rising Industries:a Comparative Analysis Based on Mainstream Economics and Evolutionary Economics

下载PDF

导出

摘要提升产业竞争力是发展战略性新兴产业的关键。本文从主流经济学和演化经济学两种不同政策体系的渊源研究出发,总结了主流经济学研发和外溢的理论以及演化经济学的技术差距、垂直联系和创新系统的理论。针对性地研究了主流经济学的政策主张:激励研发外溢;演化经济学的政策主张:创新系统的构建。基于上述两种不同的政策体系,本文提出了中国发展战略性新兴产业的政策选择:能力构建、选择性干预和政策协调等。 Improving industrial competitive power is the key to developing strategic rising industries.This article points out that the theoretical foundations of policies are mainstream economics and evolutionary economics.This article has concluded the RD and the spillover theory of mainstream economics and the technological gap,horizontal linkage and innovation system theory of evolutionary economics.The policy which has been put forward by mainstream economics is to encourage RD spillovers.The policy which has been put forward by evolutionary economics is to construct innovation system.Based on those two tyes of policies, this article recommends that the Chinese policy makers should choose capability construction,selective intervention and policy coordination to develop Chinese strategic rising industries.

作者程新章吴勇刚

机构地区上海立信会计学院华东师范大学

出处《江苏社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期90-100,共11页 Jiangsu Social Sciences

基金上海市教委创新项目07ZS176 上海市教委重点学科(J51702)资助

关键词战略性新兴产业研发外溢创新系统 strategic rising industries R＆D spillover innovation system

分类号 F092.7 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Aghion, P. and Howitt, P., Appropriate Growth Policy: A Unifying Framework. Working Paper prepared for the 20th Annual Congress of the European Economic Association. 2005.
2Breschi. S, Malerba. F, The geography of innovation and economic clustering: some introductory note, Industrial Corporation Change, 10 (4), 817-833, 2001.
3Cantwell. J, Innovation and competitiveness, in: J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
4Castellacci. F., The interactions between national systems and seetoral patterns of innovation. A cross-country analysis of Pavitt's taxonomy, DIME Working Paper, 2006.
5Cappelen. A., Castellacci. F., Fagerberg. J., Verspagen. B., The impact of regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies. 41 (4), 621- 644, 2003.
6Cooke. P, Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy, Industrial Corporation Change, 10 (4), 945- 973, 2001.
7Dosi, G., Marengo. L., Pasquali. C., How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. Research Policy, 35 (8), 1110-1121, 2006.
8Fagerberg. J., Technology and competitiveness, Oxford Review of Econnomy Policy, 12 (3), 39-51, 1996.
9Feldman. M., Audretsch. D.B., Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialisation and localised competition, European Economy Review, 43, 409-429, 1999.
10Gertler. M, Wolfe. D, Garkut. D, No place like home? The embeddedness of innovation in a regional economy, Review of International Political Economy, 7 (4), 688-718, 2000.