期刊文献+

MR多参数评分鉴别脑胶质瘤术后复发与放射性脑损伤的初步研究 被引量:2

MR Multi-parametric Scoring System in Distinction between Brain Glioma Recurrence and Radiation-induced Brain Injury:A Preliminary Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨MR多参数评分系统对脑胶质瘤术后复发与放射性脑损伤的诊断价值。资料与方法对18例脑胶质瘤术后出现异常强化区患者进行扩散加权成像(DWI)、氢质子磁共振波谱(1H-MRS)检查。计算感兴趣区的表观扩散系数比值(rADC)和代谢物峰值比值[胆碱/肌酸(Cho/Cr)、胆碱/氮-乙酰天门冬氨酸(Cho/NAA)]。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定各比值参数的最佳诊断阈值,并对每个病灶分别进行评分,联合多个参数(rADC、Cho/Cr、Cho/NAA)评分结果建立多参数评分系统,对每个病灶综合评分,总得分≥2者诊断为复发,总得分<2者诊断为放射性脑损伤。通过Kappa检验分析各参数诊断结果与金标准诊断结果的吻合程度。结果最佳诊断阈值分别为:1.41(rADC)、1.31(Cho/Cr)和1.43(Cho/NAA),诊断准确性、敏感性、特异性分别为:83.3%、83.3%、83.3%(rADC),83.3%、91.7%、66.7%(Cho/Cr),83.3%、83.3%、83.3%(Cho/NAA),多参数评分系统(94.4%、91.7%、100%);诊断结果与金标准吻合程度分别为:rADC(高度,κ=0.64)、Cho/NAA(高度,κ=0.64)、Cho/Cr(高度,κ=0.61)、多参数评分系统(极强,κ=0.87)。结论与MR单个参数诊断结果相比,MR多参数评分系统可明显提高对胶质瘤术后复发与放射性脑损伤的诊断准确性。 Objective To explore the value of MR multi-parametric scoring system in distinction between brain glioma recurrence and radiation-induced brain injury.Materials and Methods DW(Diffusion weighted)MR imaging and 1H MRS(1H Magnetic resonance spectroscopy)were obtained in eighteen postoperative patients with abnormal enhanced lesions.The ADC(apparent diffusion confficient)values of every lesion and contralateral normal white matter were measured,and ADC ratio(rADC,lesions/contralateral normal white matter)was calculated.Metabolite(NAA:N-acetyl aspartate,2.0 ppm;Cr:Creatine,3.03 ppm;Cho:Choline,3.2 ppm)peak height of every region of interest and metabolite peak ratio(Cho/Cr,Cho/NAA)were calculated.Optimum threshold was determined by using ROC(receiver operating characteristic)curve analysis.Each lesion was scored as 1(tumor progression)or 0(radiation-induced injury)according to its optimum threshold.A multi-parametric scoring system(ADC ratio,Cho/Cr ratio,Cho/NAA ratio)were established.Results Optimum threshold of ADC ratio,Cho/Cr ratio and Cho/NAA ratio were 1.41,1.31 and 1.41.Diagnostic accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of ADC ratio were 83.3%,83.3%,83.3%,those of Cho/Cr ratio were 83.3%,91.7%,66.7%,those of Cho/NAA ratio were 83.3%,83.3%,83.3%.Accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of multi-parametric scoring system were 94.4%、91.7%、100%.The match degree of the multi-parametric scoring system with the final diagnosis was strong(κ=0.87).Conclusion Multi-parametric scoring system can significantly improve the accuracy in distinction glioma recurrence from radiation-induced brain injury.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期1594-1599,共6页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 扩散加权成像 磁共振波谱 胶质瘤 复发 放射性损伤 Diffusion weighted imaging Magnetic resonance spectroscopy Glioma Recurrence Radiation injuries
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Langleben DD, Segall GM. PET in differentiation of recurrent brain tumor from radiation injury. J Nuel Med ,2000,41:1861.
  • 2Asao C, Korogi Y, Kitajima M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of radiation-induced brain injury for differentiation from tumor recurfence. AJNR ,2005,26:1455.
  • 3Hein PA,Eskey CJ,Dunn JF,et al. l)iffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas :tumor recurrence versus radiation injury. AJNR ,2004,25:201.
  • 4Matsusue E, Fink JR, Rockhill JK, et al. Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging. Neuroradiology,2010, 52: 297.
  • 5Kamada K, Houkin K, Abe H ,et al. Differentiation of cerebral radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neurol Med Chit(Tokyo) , 1997,37:250.
  • 6Zeng QS, Li CF,Kai Z,et al. Multivoxel 3D proton MR spectroscopy in the distinction of recurrent glioma from radiation injury. J Neurooncol, 2007,84 : 63.
  • 7Schlemmer HP, Bachert P, Herfarth KK, et al. Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy. AJNR,2001,22 : 1316.
  • 8Alexiu GA, Tsiouris S, Kyritsis AP, et al. Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis : accuracy of current imaging modalities. J Neurooncol ,2009,95 : 1.
  • 9董海波,戴嘉中,蔡佩武,沈天真,盛晓芳,潘力,尹士杰.^1H磁共振波谱在胶质瘤放疗后复发和放射性脑坏死鉴别中的初步应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2001,35(6):439-441. 被引量:25
  • 10Brunberg JA, Chenevert TL, McKeever PE, et al. In vivo MR determination of water diffusion coefficients and diffusion anisotropy : correlation with structural alteration in gliomas of the cerebral hemispheres. AJNR, 1995,16 : 361.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Burtscher LM,Holtas S.Proton magnetic resonance Spectroscopy in brain tumors:clinical applications.Newroradiology,2001,43:345-352.
  • 2Nadler JV,Cooper JR.N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid content of human nenral tumors and bovine peripheral nervous tissues.J Neurochem,1972,19:313-319.
  • 3Herminghaus S,Platus U,Moller-Hartman W,et al.Increased choline levels coincide with enhanced proliferative activity of human neuroepithelial brain tumors.NMR Biomed,2002,15:385-392.
  • 4Davidson A,Tart DM,Payne GS,et al.Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the evaluation of neurtoxicity following cranial irradiation for childhood cancer.Br J Radiol,2000,73:421-424.
  • 5Taylor JS,Langston JW,Raddick WE,et al.Clinical value of prton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for differentiating recurrent or residual brain tumor from delayed cerebral necrosis.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1996,36:1251-1261.
  • 6Wald LL,Nelson SJ,Day MR,et al.Serial proton Spectroscopy imaging of glioblastoma multiform after brachytherapy.J Neurosurg,1997,87:525-534.
  • 7Heesters MA,Go KG,Kamman RL,et al.11C-tyrosine positron emission tomography and 1H Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the response of brain gliomas to radiotherapy.Neuroradiology,1998,40:103-108.
  • 8Yoshino E,Ohmori Y,Imahori Y,et al.Irradiation effects on the metabolism of metastatic brain tumors:analysis by positron emission tomography and 1H -magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Sterotact Funct Neurosurg,1996,66:240-259.
  • 9周正荣,沈天真,陈星荣.脑膜瘤的磁共振成像和质子磁共振波谱[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,1999,5(3):145-148. 被引量:3
  • 10齐静,杜湘珂,谢敬霞,王德杭.磁共振质子波谱在颞叶癫痫诊断中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2000,34(3):170-173. 被引量:14

共引文献27

同被引文献20

  • 1McGirt M J, Chaichana K L, Attenello F J, et al. Extent of surgical resection is independently associated with survival in patients with hemispheric infiltrating low-grade gliomas [J]. Neuresurgery, 2008, 63(4):707-708.
  • 2Stummer W, Reulen H J, Meinel T, et al. Extent of resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: identification of and ad- justment for bias[J]. Neurosurgery, 2008, 62(3) : 564-576.
  • 3Albert F K, Forsting M, Sartor K, et al. Early postoperatice magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on re- growth and prognosis[J]. Neurosurgery, 1994, 34(1) : 45-61.
  • 4Ozttirk A, Oguz K K, Akalan N, et al. Evaluation of parenehy- mal changes at the operation site with early postoperative brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol,2006, 12(3) :115-120.
  • 5Jeffries B F,Kishore P R,Singh K S, et al. Contrast enhancement in the postoperaive brain[J]. Radiology, 1981,139 (2): 409 - 413.
  • 6Stadnik T W, Chaskis C, Miehte A, et al. Diffusion weighted MR imaging of introcerebral masses: eomparison with conven- tional MR imaging and histologie findings[J]. AJNR, 2001, 22 (5) : 969-976.
  • 7Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, et al. The role of diffusion- weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors [J]. AJNR, 2001, 22(6) :1081-1088.
  • 8Ellingson BM, Cloughesy TF, Lai A. Graded functional diffusion map-defined characteristics of apparent diffusion coeffi cients predict overall survivalin recurrent glioblastoma treated with hevacizumab [J]. Neuro Oncol, 2011, 13(10): 1151-1161.
  • 9Bernen HJ, Rijken PF, Peters H, et al. Hypoxia in a human intracerebral glioma model [J]. J Neurosurg, 2000, 93: 449- 454.
  • 10Yamasaki F, Kurisu K, Aoki T, et al. Advantages of high h value diffusion weighted imaging to diagnose pseudo-respon ses in patients with recurrent glioma after bevacizumah treal ment [J]. EurJ Radiol, 2(!12, 81(10): 2805-2810.

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部