期刊文献+

论证的基于标记的论据状态(英文) 被引量:3

A Labelling-Based Justification Status of Arguments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文针对抽象论证体系中的论据状态给出了一种基于标记的定义方法。与基于扩张的传统方法相比,此定义能够更加细致准确地描述论据状态。同时,本文对论据状态的等级进行了定义和区分,并把该等级作为接受或驳斥论据的依据。由于该方法基于标准论证体系定义,在实现上使用了已有的基于论证的证明方法,因此,该定义与以往的抽象论证体系是完全兼容的。 In this paper,we define a labelling-based justification status of the arguments in an argumentation framework.Our proposal allows for a more fine-grained notion of a justification status than the traditional extensions-based approaches.In particular,we are able to distinguish different levels at which an argument can be accepted or rejected.Our approach is fully compatible with traditional argumentation in the sense that it works on standard argumentation frameworks and can be implemented using existing argumentation-based proof procedures.
机构地区 卢森堡大学
出处 《逻辑学研究》 2010年第4期12-29,共18页 Studies in Logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Martin W. A. Caminada,Dov M. Gabbay.A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation[J].Studia Logica (-).2009(2-3)
  • 2S.Modgil,H.Prakken."Reasoning about preferences in structured extended argumentation frameworks"[].Computational Models of Argument;Proceedings of COMMA.2010
  • 3H.Prakken."Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning:some case studies"[].Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning (NMR-).2002
  • 4B.Verheij."Two approaches to dialectical argumentation:admissible sets and argumentation stages"[].Proceedings of the Eighth Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (NAIC‘ ).1996
  • 5G.A.W.Vreeswijk."An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systems"[].Computational Models of Argument;Proceedings of COMMA.2006
  • 6Authored by Mikolaj Podlaszewski. http://argulab.uni.lu/ .
  • 7L.Amgoud,L.Bodenstaff,M.Caminada,P.McBumey,S.Parsons,H.Prakken,J.van Veenen,G.A.W.Vreeswijk.Final Review and Report on Formal Argumentation System[]..2006
  • 8K.Atkinson,T.Bench-Capon.Argumentation and standards of proof[].ICAIL‘ : Proceedings of the th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law.2007
  • 9M.Caminada,Y.Wu."An argument game for stable semantics"[].Logic Journal of the Igpl.2009
  • 10M.Caminada.For the sake of the Argument.Explorations into argument-based reasoning[]..2004

同被引文献9

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部