期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术近期结果对比分析

Analysis of the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术的可靠性及安全性。方法回顾性分析96例直肠癌腹会阴联合切除病例的临床资料,其中腹腔镜手术42例,同期开腹手术病例54例,对比分析腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术的近期效果。结果腹腔镜组与开腹组所有手术均达到肿瘤根治性切除标准。腹腔镜组与开腹组平均淋巴结清扫数目分别为14.6个和12.3个,术中出血量腹腔镜组少于开腹组,分别为382.0ml和519.4ml;术后排气时间、进食时间及术后患者下床时间腹腔镜组均较开腹组提前,且差异有统计学意义;腹腔镜组与开腹组并发症发生率分别为11.9%和16.7%,无统计学差异。结论腹腔镜直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术是安全可行的,且具有出血少、胃肠功能恢复快、并发症发生率低及术后住院时间短等优势。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer. Methods Clinical data of 96 patients with rectal cancer who received abdominoperineal resection were reviewed retrospectively. Forty-two of these patients received laparoscopic operation and 54 cases received open resection. The short-term outcomes of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and open resection of rectal cancer were compared. Results All resections in the two groups achieved radical excision. The average number of removed lymph nodes in laparoscopic group ( LAG) and open group ( OG) was 14. 6 and 12. 3,respectively. The blood loss was 382. 0 ml in LAG and 519. 4 ml in OG. Passing flatus,food intake and out-of-bed activity were earlier in LAG compared with patients in OG,and differences were statistically significant. The incidence of complication in LAG and OG was similar. Conclusions Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection is safe and feasible for the patient with rectal cancer,with less complications and blood loss,more rapid intestinal recovery and shorter time of hospital stay compared with open surgery.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2010年第5期449-451,455,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
基金 国家自然科学基金(30950013)
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术 开腹 Colorectal neoplasms Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection Open resection
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK, et al. Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2006,49(8):1108-1115.
  • 2Kim SH,Park IJ,Joh YG,et al. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of thirty-month follow-up outcomes in 312 patients[ J]. Surg Endosc ,2006,20 ( 8 ) : 1197-1202.
  • 3Staudacher C, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, et al. Total mesorectal excision ( TME ) with laparoscopic approach : 226 consecutive cases [J]. Surg Oncol,2007,16:113-116.
  • 4Poon JT, Law WL. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer:a review[ J]. Ann Surg 0ncol,2009,16 ( 11 ) :3038-3047.
  • 5Vather R, Sammour T, Zargar - Shoshtari K, et al. Lymph node examination as a predictor of long-term outcome in Dukes B colon cancer[ J ]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2009,24 (3) :283-288.
  • 6Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus Open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer:aprospective randomized trial [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008,15 ( 9 ) : 2418-2425.
  • 7邱志刚,张建立,王洪友.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术围手术期对机体应激、能量代谢及内脏蛋白的影响[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(1):57-60. 被引量:20
  • 8Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients : is it safe and beneficial [ J ] .9 Gastrointest Surg, 2009,13 : 1614-1618.
  • 9Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic Versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol ,2006,13 (3) :413-424.
  • 10郑民华.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的原则与评价[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(17):1105-1108. 被引量:74

二级参考文献22

共引文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部